Explicit and Implicit Matrix Notation Question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
Alex86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Ok so this is a fairly stupid question I'm sure, but I'm not quite clear about the following:

Given a Lorentz transformation we require the following to hold:

[tex]g_{\sigma\rho}\Lambda^{\sigma}_{\mu}\Lambda^{\rho}_{\nu} = g_{\mu\nu}[/tex]

In other notation this is written:

[tex]\Lambda^{T}g\Lambda = g[/tex]

where [tex]\Lambda \in O(1,3)[/tex] and g is the Minkowski metric.

The first use of tensor notation is fine, however I am unsure why in the second expression the first [tex]\Lambda[/tex] is transposed?

Any help greatly appreciated,
Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first sum over sigma, the "rows" of g are summed with the "rows" of lambda. In matrix multiplication, rows are summed with columns. If we write lambda and g as matrices and want to express the same product as a matrix multiplication, then in order for the correct components to be multiplied, we must transpose lambda.