Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
Quantum Physics
Exploiting radiocarbon dating for FTL communication
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="PeroK, post: 6269251, member: 493650"] This is a tremendous confusion of ideas! First, relativistic time dilation, to which you allude, is symmetrical. Both samples are ageing slower in the reference frame of the other. Second, quantum entanglement results in two correlated sets of data. But, the observers have no control over the data, so cannot use the correlation to send a message. Third, Bell's theorem predicts what would happen if entangled particles were governed by so-called hidden variables (as opposed to being entangled quantum mechanically). So, what Bell's theorem predicts is generally wrong! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
Quantum Physics
Exploiting radiocarbon dating for FTL communication
Back
Top