Explore Clock Synchronisation in a Moving Train Frame

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Foppe Hoekstra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the synchronization of clocks in a moving train frame, particularly when the train is moving in a circular path. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects on clock synchronization, time dilation, and the challenges of maintaining synchronization across different frames of reference. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and potential experimental setups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where a train with synchronized clocks accelerates to a constant speed, raising questions about the timing of printed receipts from the clocks when a light signal is emitted.
  • Another participant argues that clocks do not tick slower but appear to do so due to gravitational time dilation or relative motion, introducing the concept of differential aging.
  • It is suggested that in the stationary frame (SF), all clocks remain synchronized and simply slow down by a time dilation factor, while in the co-moving frames of the wagons, synchronization is lost.
  • Participants discuss the implications of coupling between wagons, questioning whether all wagons are coupled to each other or if there are uncoupled front and back wagons, which would affect synchronization.
  • There is a debate about the feasibility of using a single global inertial frame versus constructing a global non-inertial frame for analysis, with some suggesting that using Einstein synchronization is problematic in a circular motion context.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the utility of using a global inertial frame, suggesting it complicates the analysis without clear benefits.
  • Another participant contends that it is possible to synchronize clocks along a short carriage that is instantaneously at rest, but acknowledges that this leads to inconsistencies when returning to the starting clock.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the synchronization of clocks in the moving train frame. While some agree on the effects of time dilation and the challenges of maintaining synchronization, others contest the methods proposed for analysis and the implications of different frames of reference.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of constructing non-inertial frames, the challenges of maintaining synchronization in circular motion, and the unresolved nature of how to extend synchronization methods to points off the train. There are also ambiguities regarding the assumptions made about the coupling of wagons and the applicability of Einstein synchronization in this scenario.

  • #31
Ibix said:
Unfortunately my arithmetic must have gone wrong somewhere because the train has a small gap between front and rear.
I presume you used a computer in an interative loop? If so, I'd bet long odds that you're just seeing accumulated rounding errors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Nugatory said:
I presume you used a computer in an interative loop? If so, I'd bet long odds that you're just seeing accumulated rounding errors.
Turns out to be too many tools in my workflow. I simplified a bit - still don't know quite what I did wrong, but the numbers going into the generation process were wrong. Corrected results are below:
246190

No comments to add to my previous, except now you can see that the front of the train is coincident with the rear. Using the green "chain of local Einstein synchronisations" makes the pattern overlap due to the motion of the train while the printing happens. Using the orange "synchronised in rest frame" criterion for printing makes the pattern even, but adjacent clocks do not print simultaneously according to an observer in the carriage.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
My last post with Minkowski diagrams, as no-one seems to be responding (no disrespect to Nugatory intended).

First of all, here's a (very long) train on a (very long) straight track. It is initially stationary and then accelerates to a constant speed. The acceleration profile is chosen so that the ends of the carriages are the same distance apart in the track frame (thus they are moving apart in their own frame).
246259

The red line represents the front carriage and the blue line the back one. This is actually the standard Bell's spaceships configuration, just with eleven carriages instead of two ships. Clocks in the carriages tick every half-year of proper time, and these events are marked. The clocks are initially synchronised and remain synchronised with one another in the track frame, although they tick slower than coordinate time clocks - there are only ten ticks in six years. Acceleration terminates at ##\tau=3##, which is about ##t=3.25##

Next, here is a diagram of a train accelerating so that the distance between the carriages remains constant for observers on the train. It's fairly easy to see that this requires the train observers to be a family of Rindler observers with shared horizons.
246260

As before, clock ticks are marked with crosses. They are initially synchronised in the track frame but, due to different velocity profiles, they de-synchronise during the acceleration. Because the requirement is that the final velocity be the same along the train, the carriages stop accelerating at different times - these are marked with red crosses. Note that, in the way I've chosen to set this up, the blue clock behaves identically to the blue clock in the first diagram. You can also see that the train is undergoing length contraction.

It's also interesting to see the above in the final rest frame of the train:
246261

You can see that the carriages stop accelerating simultaneously in this frame, but their clocks are not synchronised. You can also see that the separation of the carriages after the acceleration is, in this frame, the same as it was before in the track frame, as promised.

Finally, why am I talking about this linear track? It's because the surface of a cylinder has the same geometry as a plane, albeit with a different topology. So you can simply wrap these diagrams into cylinders with the t-axis parallel to the cylinder axis to get cylindrical diagrams like the ones I posted before. Or one can imagine slitting the cylinders parallel to their axis and spreading them out to get flat diagrams.

Because the original problem specification was that the train exactly fitted around the track, in either of the first two diagrams we can simply cut off everything to the right of ##x=2## and paste it on to the left to get a Minkowski diagram of the "unwrapped" cylinder. So at the start of the experiment the red and blue lines are coincident, and anything that passes ##x=2## moves to ##x=0##. Here, then, is the version keeping constant acceleration in the track frame:
246262

The red and blue lines are initially coincident and remain coincident (this has been rendered as black by the colour-combining process I used). You can see that the clock ticks always remain simultaneous in the track frame, as they must from the symmetry of a situation where every clock does the same thing in this frame.

What about the case where the train is free to keep its natural length? That looks like this:
246263

Here we can see that a gap opens up as the train length contracts and the clocks de-synchronise.

In both cases, if the clocks were re-synchronised after the acceleration, their "same time" ticks would look like the red events - non-simultaneous in the track frame. Note that the string of red events goes all the way around the cylinder and a little bit more, so if these were used to time printing then the end of the pattern would overlap the beginning.

So here's the takeaway message: the clock synchronisation you get is your choice. You can re-synchronise your clocks by some procedure after the acceleration, or you can accept whatever you get from synchronising pre-acceleration. The results of either approach will differ depending on the exact physical situation (which is also your choice!)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 111 ·
4
Replies
111
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K