Exploring Gravitation: A Review of Kip Thorne and John Wheeler's Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Gravitation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The book "Gravitation" by Kip Thorne and John Wheeler is a highly recommended technical textbook on General Relativity (GR), rated around 3-4 on a difficulty scale of 1-5. It is praised for its pedagogical approach compared to other challenging texts such as "General Relativity" by PAM Dirac and "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (MTW). Readers also highlight "Wald's book" as a terse and difficult resource, while "Carroll's graduate text" is noted for being more accessible. Overall, "Gravitation" stands out as a monumental work in the field of GR.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with advanced mathematical techniques
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus
  • Experience with graduate-level physics textbooks
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "General Relativity" by PAM Dirac for advanced insights
  • Study "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (MTW) for comprehensive GR coverage
  • Read "A General Relativity Workbook" by Robert J. McElrath for practical exercises
  • Investigate "Spacetime and Geometry" by Sean Carroll for a more approachable text
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and researchers interested in deepening their understanding of General Relativity through recommended textbooks and comparative analysis of their pedagogical strengths.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
i wonder, the book by kip thorne and john wheeler called gravitation, is it a technical textbook on gr? and on a scale of 1-5 (1-easy 5 extremely hard) how would you rate this book?
are there any other challenging textbooks on GR?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
neutrino, i too hope that someday i would have a spare time to read this monumental textbook. (that with the principia mathematica by russel and whitehead are hardcore texts in their respective fields).
 
Gravitation is the one that I studied, and I highly recommend. I have read Wald's book, and I don't think that it is as pedogagical as is Gravitation (though I have a slight bias).

Or you could look into PAM Dirac's "General Relativity", it's probably the hardest book I've read on General Relativity.
 
Wald's book is a tough nut, very terse and not very friendly, but it still has much material not found in other books.

I recently got Carroll's graduate text, and it's much more friendly than Wald. But I paid $70 for a used copy. :eek:

Can anyone claim to have read all of MTW? What a monster. Still a cool book to dip into now and then.
 
Daverz said:
Wald's book is a tough nut, very terse and not very friendly, but it still has much material not found in other books.

I find amusing what Wald said about the exercises in his book: ' ... and none (exercises) which are, in my opinion, inordinately difficult (i.e., I think I can solve them).'

This, from one of the world's leading experts on relativity!

I recently got Carroll's graduate text, and it's much more friendly than Wald. But I paid $70 for a used copy. :eek:

Chapter 9 is worth the price of admission.

Can anyone claim to have read all of MTW? What a monster.

Not me.

Still a cool book to dip into now and then.

It's sitting open on my desk as I type.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
16K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K