Exploring Oscillatory Motion of Two Connected Masses on a Frictionless Track

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the oscillatory motion of two connected masses on a frictionless track, specifically analyzing the force equation F = -k(x2 - x1 - deltaXe) where k is the spring constant. Participants clarify the equilibrium separation and the conditions under which the forces between the masses are attractive or repulsive. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the positions of the masses relative to the center of the spring to derive the equations of motion accurately. Key equations discussed include m1\ddot x1 = -F_s and m2\ddot x2 = F_s, leading to the conclusion that the system's dynamics can be simplified under certain conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of oscillatory motion and harmonic oscillators
  • Ability to manipulate and solve differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equations of motion for coupled oscillators
  • Explore the concept of normal modes in oscillatory systems
  • Learn about the impact of mass ratios on oscillatory frequency
  • Investigate energy conservation in spring-mass systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of oscillatory systems and spring mechanics.

grandpa2390
Messages
473
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Two masses slide freely in a horizontal frictionless track and are connected by a Spring whose force constant is k. Fid the frequency of oscillatory motion for this system.

Homework Equations


My professor posted the solution but I am having trouble understanding everything that he did.
according to the solution, the first step is defining the Force equation as
F = -k(x2 - x1 - deltaXe) where deltaXe is the equilibrium separation. x1 is the distance to the center of mass of m1 from some point to the left of m1. x2 is the distance from that point to the center of m2. so that x2-x1 equals the distance between the center of m1 and m2.

The Attempt at a Solution


the distance between the atoms at which the force on each atom is zero. Is the force repulsive (atoms are pushed apart) or attractive (atoms are pulled together) if their separation is (b) smaller and (c) larger than the equilibrium separation
is this the distance between the two masses when the spring is neither compressed nor stretched? Wouldn't that just be x2-x1? so the the Force would be 0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
and then later on in the solution he takes says that dXe is equal to x2e - x1e (x2e = the distance of m2 from the center of the spring during equilibrium and likewise with x1e) shouldn't dXe = x2e + x1e ?
 
My professor posted the solution but I am having trouble understanding everything that he did
Doesn't look like a relevant equation to me. Don't you have a few things that look like

##m_1\ddot x_1 = - F_s##

##m_2\ddot x_2 = F_s##

## F_s = -k (x_2 - x_1 - \Delta x_{eq})##
so that we can do some mathematics on them ?

Because in that case we could easily derive

##m_1\ddot x_1 + m_2\ddot x_2 =0##

and concentrate on

##m_1 \ddot x_1 - m_2 \ddot x_2 + 2k( x_2 - x_1 - \Delta x_{eq})=0## ?

And perhaps the masses happen to be equal ? Saves work and yields a pleasant answer.

Then: In your attempt there is the sudden appearance of atoms that weren't there before. Please read what you wrote as if you were a helper trying to make sense of your post. I am one and I can't.
 
that third equation is the one. I figured out what it was. the origin was defined in the middle of the spring. So that x1 is negative. so it does turn out right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K