Easy problem about two bars connected by a spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two blocks connected by a spring, focusing on the dynamics of their motion and the forces involved. The original poster presents a mathematical approach to derive the equations of motion, while others provide feedback and alternative perspectives on the setup and definitions used in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of variables related to the positions of the blocks and the spring's extension. There are discussions about the correct formulation of the equations of motion and the implications of defining certain variables as zero.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into potential errors in the original poster's approach, particularly regarding the treatment of the spring's natural length and the definitions of the variables. Alternative methods and perspectives are being explored, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without a clear consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the assumptions made about the initial conditions and the definitions of the variables, particularly concerning the natural length of the spring and its impact on the equations derived. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in resolving the differential equations accurately.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
All below.
Relevant Equations
All below.
1591824796655.png
1591824828055.png

My solution:
The distance between the block is x2-x1.
x2'' = F/m2 - k(x2-x1)/m2
x1'' = k(x2-x1)/m1

x2''-x1'' = x''.

x'' = F/m2 - kx(1/m1 + 1/m2)

Being y = (1/m1 + 1/m2)

That is>

x = (lo - Fy/m2k)*cos(wt) + Fy/m2k

xmin = lo
xmáx = -lo + 2*F*y/(m2*k) = -lo + 2*m1*F/k(m1+m2)

But the answer to xmax is lo + 2*m1*F/k(m1+m2)

Do you see any error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you used x1, x2 and x, you effectively defined these as though l0=0. That's fine so long as you remember to add l0 back right at the end. But somehow you got it as being multiplied by the cos term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
haruspex said:
The way you used x1, x2 and x, you effectively defined these as though l0=0. That's fine so long as you remember to add l0 back right at the end. But somehow you got it as being multiplied by the cos term.

I am not sure if i understood, are you saying that maybe i made an error in resolving the differential equation?

x'' = F/m2 - kx(1/m1 + 1/m2)
x = Acos(wt) + Bsin(wt) + Fy/m2k `(actually 1/y = 1/m1 + 1/m2)
xo = lo = A + Fy/m2k
x'o = vo = 0 = Bw
B equals zero
A equals lo - Fy/m2k

So we get the final answer
(lo - Fy/m2k)*cos(wt) + Fy/m2k
?
 
You use ##kx## for your force, but ##x## is the distance between the bars whilst ##x-l_0## is the extension! If you replace change your equations accordingly, you will get that the general solution is then $$x = A\cos`{(\omega t)} + \frac{F}{kym_2} + l_0$$ and you can deduce that ##A = -\frac{F}{kym_2}## with ##x(0) = l_0##, which then gives you the correct result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
Oh i betrayed myself>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:O

thank you all.
 
LCSphysicist said:
I am not sure if i understood, are you saying that maybe i made an error in resolving the differential equation?

x'' = F/m2 - kx(1/m1 + 1/m2)
x = Acos(wt) + Bsin(wt) + Fy/m2k `(actually 1/y = 1/m1 + 1/m2)
xo = lo = A + Fy/m2k
x'o = vo = 0 = Bw
B equals zero
A equals lo - Fy/m2k

So we get the final answer
(lo - Fy/m2k)*cos(wt) + Fy/m2k
?
I am saying that your solution was technically in error right at the start:
The distance between the block is x2-x1.
x2'' = F/m2 - k(x2-x1)/m2


If the distance between the blocks is x2-x1 then the tension is k(x2-x1-l0).
If you redefine your x variables so as to exclude l0 then all your equations work, but when you solve the ODE there will be no l0.
Having solved it, and obtained the min and max values of x, you can add l0 back to get the min and max values of the separation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist and etotheipi
I wonder how many other ways there are of doing it. One might be to consider that ##a_{CM} = \frac{F}{(m_1 + m_2)}##. If we then transform into the frame of the CM, then both masses are performing SHM under the action of the inertial forces ##-\frac{Fm_1}{(m_1 + m_2)}## and ##-\frac{Fm_2}{(m_1 + m_2)}## respectively.

Once you work out the initial ratio of the lengths of spring on either side of the CM in terms of ##l_0##, then you can also work out the effective spring constants in terms of ##k##. And it's just like two springs in a gravitational field! You can quickly calculate the equilibrium positions and from that obtain the final result.

Maybe it takes a little longer than your method in this case; I'll try it tomorrow!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K