Exploring the Possibilities of Space Travel and Weaponry Development

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quinapalus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Achieving the speed of light is impossible, but traveling at 99% of that speed is theoretically feasible, allowing for deceleration back to a stationary state relative to an observer. The challenges lie in engineering solutions to accelerate to such speeds and prevent damage from collisions with particles. Regarding weaponry, while energy-based weapons are popular in sci-fi, practical advancements are likely to focus on kinetic weapons for infantry, with vehicles potentially utilizing lasers for defense against missiles. The discussion highlights the limitations of current technology and the speculative nature of future weapon development, including concepts like coilguns and plasma weapons. Overall, the future of space travel and weaponry development remains a complex interplay of theoretical physics and engineering challenges.
Quinapalus
Question #1: Let's say you had a space-ship that could accelerate to the speed light. Once you had attained this speed would it be possible to slow down from that speed? Or would this be impossible because the speed of light is constant? I'm already anticipating that some will say it's impossible to attain the speed of light in the first place. Well, what if your ship is traveling only at a mere 99% of c?

Question #2: What is the future of weaponry? Various sci-fi media like to show our heroes and villains wielding energy-based weapons. But as I understand it, it would be very difficult to harness such a huge amount of energy effectively for a small weapon and isn't really realistic. So how can we realistically expect weapons technologies to develop? (Edited for clarification)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quinapalus said:
Question #1: Let's say you had a space-ship that could accelerate to the speed light. Once you had attained this speed would it be possible to slow down from that speed? Or would this be impossible because the speed of light is constant? I'm already anticipating that some will say it's impossible to attain the speed of light in the first place.

Right. It is impossible for us to travel at the speed of light. We can (theoretically) go very fast, like 99.999999% the speed of light, but never 100%.

Well, what if your ship is traveling only at a mere 99% of c?

One of the things to learn in relativity is that you are always traveling at a certain speed relative to something else. For all we know, we might already be traveling at 99% the speed of light relative to some observer, meaning that some observer on some far away planet might see us traveling at 99% the speed of light already. Of course, we don't see ourselves traveling the speed of light, in fact, we see ourselves not moving at all!

So let me clarify the scenario for you. You are sitting on a spaceship which is stationary on the earth. Then you leave Earth and accelerate until you are traveling 99% the speed of light relative to me, who is still sitting on the earth. Then you slow down again until I see you traveling at my speed again. Yes, this is theoretically perfectly possible. I don't know anything in physics that forbids this scenario. It's only an engineering problem. That is, we must find some way to accelerate you to 99% the speed of light. And we must somehow make sure the spaceship doesn't get destroyed by hitting some slower particles. So there are various practical challenges involved which I doubt we will ever solve, but theoretically it's possible.
 
Thanks, that really helps. :)
 
Question #2: TV trope has a section about it, Kineticsarejustbetter.
Otherwise i think infantry weapons will remain kinetics for a long time, vehicles can rather support lasers, and use them to take out inbound missiles, but they might still don't disappear (depending on laser focusing, and target tracking vs jamming efficiency).
Personally i like coilguns. We don't know too much about ball lightning, so i don't know what can be the plausability of SF plasma weapons?
 
Last edited:
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
I thought I had discovered a giant plot hole in Avatar universe, but apparently it's based on a faulty notion. So, the anti-gravity effect that lifts whole mountains into the sky is unrelated to the unobtanium deposits? Apparently the value of unobtanium is in its property as a room temperature superconductor, which enables their superluminal drive technology. Unobtanium is found in large deposits underground, which is why they want to mine the ground. OK. So, these mountains - which...
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
508
Replies
61
Views
9K
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top