How Can Wind Tunnel Data Collection Enhance Your A2 Physics Coursework?

Click For Summary
Wind tunnel data collection can significantly enhance A2 physics coursework by allowing students to explore how different shaped objects behave under high-speed air. The preliminary testing involved creating a wind tunnel and using a smoke machine to visualize airflow, although initial results were not optimal. Suggestions for improving data collection include using streamers to visualize airflow around objects and implementing anemometers and pressure sensors for quantitative measurements. Enhancing visual representation of smoke can also be achieved through better lighting techniques. Overall, refining these methods can lead to more comprehensive data analysis and understanding of aerodynamic properties.
fixty
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm nearly at the end of my preliminary testing for a wind tunnel in my A2 physics coursework. My question for my project so far is: "Do different shaped objects exhibit different properties under the influence of high speed air". For my coursework I need to measure or observe something to get a large pool of data for later analysis.

My preliminary experiment has been based around a wind tunnel and gathering as much data as possible. I cut a polystyrene wing out (using a hot wire and a fume cupboard) and made the wind tunnel with lots of help from a science technician at school. I used a smoke machine to see if I could get visible air observations by seeing the amount of air that dissipated on each side and the turbulence nearer the rear by changing the angle of attack for different objects. It didn't provide the best results so I tried blacking out the wind tunnel, pointing directional lights at it from all angles, coning the FOV of the camera to block out glare but to not much avail.

Here's the best video from the preliminaries I got.



I'm looking for some suggestions and ideas for different ways to obtain data from this wind tunnel we've built (I also had ideas for using an anemometer, springs and pressure but am stuck on how to implement these) and how to get better visual representations of the smoke. If anyone could throw some suggestions at me that'd great.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

Maybe put a streamer (colored twine) on the end of a rod, and move the rod around your airfoil to show what the streamlines would look like if your smoke streamline setup were working better... :smile:

I also think I've seen some setups where they glue little short streamers onto various parts of the object in the wind tunnel, to look at the airflow around the object. I searched Google Images for a picture, but no luck so far...
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K