Exponential Attenuation and Beta Particle Range

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the range of beta particles in air using the law of exponential attenuation. A beta emitter's atomic mass and its daughter's atomic mass difference are provided, with the goal of determining the particle range. The mass attenuation coefficient is introduced, but the user struggles with the initial intensity (I0) and the implications of setting intensity to zero. It is clarified that I cannot be set to zero, as this only occurs at infinity, and the aim should be to find a characteristic length scale where intensity decreases significantly. The relevance of the mass defect is questioned, emphasizing the need for a practical approach to the problem.
Ishy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Exponential Attenuation and Beta Particle Range (solved)

Homework Statement


I am given a beta emitter and its atomic mass, as well as the atomic mass of its daughter, which have a difference of 0.0034 amu. I am to determine the range of the particles in air.

Homework Equations


I am given the law of exponential attenuation:
I=I0e^(-ux)
And substituted for mass attenuation coefficient:
I=I0e^(-um*px)
um and p(rho) are readily available, and can be considered given

The Attempt at a Solution


So I am looking for x, but I do not know I0 (is there some relation between mass or energy and intensity?), and if I'm looking for the range, I assume I to be 0 (if intensity is energy flux x velocity, at the end of the range it must approach 0) which opens up all sorts of nasty when we try to find ln0 (which, essentially approaches infinity).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. What is the relevance of the mass defect?

2. You can not set I=0, because that will only happen at x=infty, which is useless.

3. You want to find a characteristic length scale, typically the distance over which the intensity drops by a factor of e.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K