Exponential of a large negative number

Click For Summary
To calculate the exponential of a large negative number, the formula e^(-r) = 10^(-r log e) is discussed, raising questions about whether to use base 10 or natural logarithm. Clarification is sought on whether log e should represent log 0 or log 1. The discussion also explores the values of e raised to the zero and first powers, questioning their relevance in the context of the formula. The law of exponents is mentioned as a potential method for deriving the formula, emphasizing that e raised to any power follows standard exponent rules. Overall, the conversation centers on understanding the correct logarithmic interpretation in the exponential calculation.
Aadrych
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I read on a previous post that to calculate the exponential of a large negative number I use the formula:
e-r=10(-rloge)
This is just a quick question but it it meant to be a log 10 or natural log and also is it meant to be loge0 or loge1

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Aadrych said:
I read on a previous post that to calculate the exponential of a large negative number I use the formula:
e-r=10(-rloge)
This is just a quick question but it it meant to be a log 10 or natural log and also is it meant to be loge0 or loge1
What is e raised to the zero power? What is the natural log of that? What is the base 10 log of that? Would either interpretation make any sense?

What is e raised to the first power? What is the natural log of that? Would that interpretation make any sense?

Can you use the law of exponents, (ab)c = abc to derive the formula in question?
 
It should be obvious that if that were a natural logarithm, then ln(e) would be 1 and there would be no reason to write it!
I can see no reason to as if the "e" is e^0 or e^1. Any number, a, by itself, is a^1. Any number, including e, to the 0 power is 1.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K