Exponential of hermitian matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the properties of the matrix U = exp[-iA], where A is a Hermitian matrix. It is established that the eigenvectors of A remain eigenvectors of U, with corresponding eigenvalues given by exp[-i*a_i]. The importance of this relationship is highlighted in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of time evolution of wavefunctions. Additionally, the task of proving that U is unitary is emphasized, with hints provided on utilizing the determinant property of unitary matrices. The conversation revolves around applying the Taylor expansion of U to the eigenvalue equations of A to derive these results.
ZCOR
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be a Hermitian matrix and consider the matrix U = exp[-iA] defined by thr Taylor expansion of the exponential.

a) Show that the eigenvectors of A are eigenvectors of U. If the eigenvalues of A are a subscript(i) for i=1,...N, show that the eigenvalues of U are exp[-i*a subscript(i)].

b) Show that U is unitary.

This example is important in quantum mechanics when A=Ht/h, where H is the Hamiltonian operator, t is time, and h is Plank's constant. Then U evolves the wavefunction over a time t.

Homework Equations


I have uploaded what I have come up with so far, but not sure where to go with it

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
See uploaded file
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3531.JPG
    IMG_3531.JPG
    41 KB · Views: 1,021
Physics news on Phys.org
You have ##A\nu_i = a_i \nu_i## where ##a_i## is the eigenvalue corresponding to an eigenvector ##\nu_i##. Have you tried inputting this eigenvalue equation into the eigenvalue equation for ##U## using its Taylor expansion definition?
ZCOR said:
Show that U is unitary.
Do you know the property of the determinant of a unitary matrix?
 
Ok, will see if I can make that work. Thanks!
 
I'm trying to figure this out, but not sure how to input that equation into the Taylor expansion
 
Try applying ##U## in its Taylor form to an eigenvector of ##A##
$$
(I + iA - \frac{1}{2}A^2 - i\frac{1}{6} A^3 + \ldots) \nu_i .
$$
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K