Exponentiating Matrices: Representation of \exp{(iÔ)}

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the representation of the matrix exponential \exp{(iÔ)} where Ô is defined as a 2x2 matrix: \(\begin{pmatrix} 1 & \sqrt{3} \\ \sqrt{3} & -1 \end{pmatrix}\). The solution involves using the lemma that states if P is an invertible matrix, then \exp{(P^{-1}AP)} = P^{-1}\exp{(A)}P. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Ô are computed to derive the final matrix representation of \exp{(iÔ)}. The user seeks assistance in expressing the vector |v> in the eigenbasis of \exp{(iÔ)}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix exponentiation, particularly for non-diagonal matrices.
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of the properties of complex matrices and their transformations.
  • Experience with quantum mechanics concepts as referenced in Cohen-Tannoudji's book.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of eigendecomposition for 2x2 matrices.
  • Learn about matrix exponentiation techniques for non-diagonal matrices.
  • Explore the implications of the lemma regarding invertible matrices in matrix exponentiation.
  • Investigate the application of eigenvalues in quantum mechanics, particularly in state representation.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, mathematicians, and anyone working with linear algebra and matrix theory, particularly in the context of quantum state representation and transformations.

OhNoYaDidn't
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Consider the operator Ô, choose a convenient base and obtain the representation of
<br /> \ exp{(iÔ)}<br />
<br /> Ô =<br /> \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; \sqrt{3} \\<br /> \sqrt{3} &amp; -1<br /> \end{smallmatrix}\bigr)<br />

Attempt at solution:
So, i read on Cohen-Tannjoudji's Q.M. book that if the matrix is diagonal you can just exponentiate the diagonal elements and that's pretty much it. However, when the matrix is not diagonal, you have to use something like the following:
Lemma: A, P complex matrices, n by n, let's suppose P is invertible, then exp{({P_{}}^{-1}AP)} = {P_{}}^{-1}exp{(A)}P

The proof is not so hard, we basically expand the exponential and note that: {({P_{}}^{-1}AP)}^m = P^{-1} A^mPSo, finding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of O, we get:
exp{(iÔ)} = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> -exp{(-2i)}-3exp{(2i)} &amp; 3exp{(-2i)}-3exp{(2i)} \\<br /> exp{(-2i)}-exp{(2i)} &amp; -3exp{(-2i)}-exp{(2i)}<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

Now I'm asked to write |v&gt; = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1\\ 0<br /> <br /> \end{pmatrix}
on the eigenbase of exp{(iÔ)}

Can you guys help me out? I don't really get what they ask me to do :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compute the eigendecomposition of the matrix. Exponentiate the eigenvalues. Put the matrix back together with the new eigenvalues.

##M = \sum_\lambda \lambda \;|\lambda\rangle \langle \lambda|##

##F(M) = \sum_\lambda F(\lambda) \; |\lambda\rangle \langle \lambda|##

Where the ##\lambda##s in the sum are the eigenvalues/vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes Igael

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K