Expressing a root of a cubic polynomial as a series

[SeventhSigma]

Is there a good way to do this?

I have an equation, say x^3 - 4*x^2 + 2, so a=1, b=-4, c=0, d=2.

Is there an easy way to express the largest root of such an equation? In this case, the roots are:

3.8661982625090223
-0.65544238154983
0.7892441190408067

But I am trying to find an easier way to extract that 3.866 root in such a way that I can express it in terms of as many digits as I want (incrementally, so as to not waste computer memory doing crazy float math). I've tried looking at the wiki entries for cubic functions and Taylor expansions but I feel like I'm hitting a brick wall.

Apologies if my question is not clear.

 

[SeventhSigma]

And yes, I'm aware of Newton's Method, but the problem is that it requires me to divide a function by its derivative, which ultimately results in a decimal of infinite length (meaning I have to truncate it and lose information).

 

[DrStupid]

And yes, I'm aware of Newton's Method, but the problem is that it requires me to divide a function by its derivative, which ultimately results in a decimal of infinite length (meaning I have to truncate it and lose information).

How about the bisection method? Of course there are also limitations (as with every other numerical method) but it is not as worse as with Newton.

 

[SeventhSigma]

I'm just not sure how I'd use that to extract an arbitrary number of digits. For example, I'm trying to find a way to spit out 3, 8,6, 6, 1, 9, 8, etc -- the big root, for as many iterations as I aim for.

edit: something similar to this http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Algorithms/SpigotForPi.shtml

 

[I like Serena]

Just of the top of my head:

You could calculate the extrema (set derivative to zero).
Pick a point to the left of the leftmost extrema, calculate the tangent line and intersect it with the x-axis.
There! A lower bracket.

If there are no extrema, search left and right with some step, until your signs are different.
There! A bracket.

 

[SeventhSigma]

My problem isn't finding roots -- it's returning arbitrarily long decimal expansions

 

[I like Serena]

Ah sorry, my bad.

Well, you could simply calculate all roots and pick the biggest.

The solution of x^3+ax^2+bx+c = 0 is:

Q={a^2-3b \over 9}

R={2a^3-9ab +27c \over 54}

if R^2 < Q^3 then

\theta=\arccos(R / \sqrt{Q^3})

x_1=-2\sqrt Q \cos({\theta \over 3}) - {a \over 3}

x_2=-2\sqrt Q \cos({\theta + 2\pi \over 3}) - {a \over 3}

x_3=-2\sqrt Q \cos({\theta - 2\pi \over 3}) - {a \over 3}​

else

A=-sgn(R)\left[|R| + \sqrt{R^2-Q^3}\right]^{1 \over 3}

B=(Q/A) \text{ if } (A \ne 0) \text{ or 0 otherwise}

x_1=(A+B) - {a \over 3}​

fi

 

[SeventhSigma]

Right, but I mean how do I then take that sort of formulation and then spit out, say, N digits, where I'm dealing with each digit as a standalone entity?

ex:

for N in range (1, 100):
return Nth digit of cubic root

 

[I like Serena]

Sorry, I finally understand what you're asking, but I've got no clue.