Expressing the determinant as the product of two determinants

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on expressing the determinant of a specific matrix as the product of two determinants. The matrix in question is defined as follows: $$ \left(\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ a^2 & b^2 & c^2 \end{array}\right)$$. The goal is to demonstrate that the determinant equals the expression (a - b)^2 (b - g)^2 (g - a)^2, where sr = a^r + b^r + c^r. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between linear transformations and matrix products to solve the problem effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of determinants and their properties
  • Familiarity with linear transformations and matrix multiplication
  • Knowledge of inner products in vector spaces
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants, particularly in relation to polynomial expressions
  • Learn about linear transformations and their representation using matrices
  • Explore the concept of inner products in vector spaces and their applications
  • Practice using LaTeX for formatting mathematical expressions and equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced determinant properties and matrix theory.

Sdelange
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is what the symbols in the question represent( sorry about the syntax) ;
sr = s subscript r
a^r = alpha to the power of r
b^r = beta to the power of r
g^r = gamma to the power of r

Question:

If sr = a^r + b^r + c^r, by expressing the determinant as the product of two determinants, show that

l 3 s1 s2 l
l s1 s2 s3 l
l s2 s3 s4 l

= (a - b)^2 (b - g)^2 (g - a)^2


What I have used so far is the theory behind the product of two matrices being equal to the composition of the matrix corresponding to the linear transformations.

In R2, if you have a set of points x and y, its very simple to work out Ta : (x,y) -> (u,v) and then Tb : (u,v) -> (w,z) . But I'm having problems with actually finding a matrix to work with. Have tried out quite a few things, but I get lost in a whole mess of polynomials. Just need a head start please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider this a hint

$$ \left(\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1 \\ a & b & c \\ a^2 & b^2 & c^2 \end{array}\right)$$.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sdelange said:
This is what the symbols in the question represent( sorry about the syntax) ;
sr = s subscript r
a^r = alpha to the power of r
b^r = beta to the power of r
g^r = gamma to the power of r

Question:

If sr = a^r + b^r + c^r, by expressing the determinant as the product of two determinants, show that

l 3 s1 s2 l
l s1 s2 s3 l
l s2 s3 s4 l

= (a - b)^2 (b - g)^2 (g - a)^2


What I have used so far is the theory behind the product of two matrices being equal to the composition of the matrix corresponding to the linear transformations.

In R2, if you have a set of points x and y, its very simple to work out Ta : (x,y) -> (u,v) and then Tb : (u,v) -> (w,z) . But I'm having problems with actually finding a matrix to work with. Have tried out quite a few things, but I get lost in a whole mess of polynomials. Just need a head start please.


I am going to use LaTeX in this posting, and will use the symbols a, b, c instead of \alpha, \beta, \gamma. If you introduce the 3-vectors
u_0 = (1,1,1), \; u_1 = (a,b,c), \; u_2 = (a^2, b^2, c^2),
and define the inner product of two 3-vectors x = (x_1,x_2,x_3) \text{ and } y = (y_1,y_2,y_3) as \langle x , y \rangle= x_1 y_1 + x_2 y_2 + x_3 y_3, then your determinant has the form
D = \left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \langle u_0, u_0 \rangle &amp; \langle u_0,u_1 \rangle &amp; \langle u_0,u_2 \rangle\\<br /> \langle u_1, u_0 \rangle &amp; \langle u_1,u_1 \rangle &amp; \langle u_1,u_2 \rangle\\<br /> \langle u_2, u_0 \rangle &amp; \langle u_2,u_1 \rangle &amp; \langle u_2,u_2 \rangle<br /> \end{array} \right|<br />

RGV
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K