Factorization of Polynomials - Irreducibles - Anderson and Feil

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the irreducibility of the polynomial \(x^4 + 2\) in the context of abstract algebra, specifically referencing the work of Anderson and Feil. Participants explore methods to demonstrate this irreducibility, drawing parallels to the previously established irreducibility of \(x^2 + 2\) in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\).

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Peter seeks assistance in showing that \(x^4 + 2\) is irreducible in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\), referencing the irreducibility of \(x^2 + 2\).
  • One participant suggests using Eisenstein's Irreducibility Criterion as a potential method to demonstrate the irreducibility of \(x^4 + 2\).
  • Peter expresses appreciation for the help and clarifies the absence of attachments due to quota issues.
  • Another participant provides guidance on how to delete previous attachments to resolve Peter's issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not present a consensus on the method to prove the irreducibility of \(x^4 + 2\), as only one method is suggested and no further exploration or alternative methods are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not provided detailed steps or justifications for the application of Eisenstein's Criterion, leaving the discussion open to further elaboration or alternative approaches.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Anderson and Feil - A First Course in Abstract Algebra.

On page 56 (see attached) ANderson and Feil show that the polynomial f = x^2 + 2 is irreducible in \mathbb{Q} [x]

After this they challenge the reader with the following exercise:

Show that x^4 + 2 is irreducible in \mathbb{Q} [x]. taking your lead from the discussion of x^2 + 2 above. (see attached)

Can anyone help me to show this in the manner requested. Would appreciate the help.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Anderson and Feil - A First Course in Abstract Algebra.

On page 56 (see attached) ANderson and Feil show that the polynomial f = x^2 + 2 is irreducible in \mathbb{Q} [x]

After this they challenge the reader with the following exercise:

Show that x^4 + 2 is irreducible in \mathbb{Q} [x]. taking your lead from the discussion of x^2 + 2 above. (see attached)

Can anyone help me to show this in the manner requested. Would appreciate the help.

Peter

Hi Peter, :)

I don't see any attachments in your post. You can use a image hosting website such as TinyPic to upload images and link them here, if you have trouble attaching files.

To show that \(x^4 + 2\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\) you can use Eisenstein's Irreducibility Criterion.
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi Peter, :)

I don't see any attachments in your post. You can use a image hosting website such as TinyPic to upload images and link them here, if you have trouble attaching files.

To show that \(x^4 + 2\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\) you can use Eisenstein's Irreducibility Criterion.
Thanks - most helpful - appreciate your help

The reason I did not upload the attachement was that I could not delete my old attachements - about 5 or so are there and they exceed my allowed quota _ I cannot seem to delete them

Peter
 
Peter said:
Thanks - most helpful - appreciate your help

The reason I did not upload the attachement was that I could not delete my old attachements - about 5 or so are there and they exceed my allowed quota _ I cannot seem to delete them

Peter

To if you want to delete your previous attachments go to "http://www.mathhelpboards.com/usercp.php" and then click on the "http://www.mathhelpboards.com/profile.php?do=editattachments" under the "My Settings" pane. Hope this will work for you. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K