Fall Rate of Objects: Explaining Why Weight Matters

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a CSET practice exam question regarding the fall rate of two similarly shaped and weighted objects dropped from a height. The correct answer states that the weight of the objects does not affect their falling rate relative to each other, as they experience the same acceleration due to gravity. Participants clarify that while weight influences falling rate in general, it does not matter when comparing identical objects. They also note that air resistance would be similar for both objects due to their shape and weight, and that in a vacuum, shape differences become irrelevant. Overall, the question is criticized for its vagueness and misleading terminology.
apathak5025
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello -

I have a question from a CSET practice exam that I'm having trouble understanding the provided answer.

Q Two items are dropped simultaneously from a ten-story building. The items are shaped similarly and are relatively the same weight. Which of the following statements is correct concerning the rate at which the objects fall?
1. The weight of the objects has no effect on the falling rate.
2. The resistance of the air has no effect on the falling rate.
3. The shape of the objects has no effect on falling rate.
4. The distance of the fall has a major effect on the falling rate.

The answer is 1. Can someone please explain why the other choices are incorrect. I understand that objects weight has no effect on the falling rate of acceleration, but why wouldn't the shape have an effect? The two objects are similar in shape, which would make sense why the it wouldn't have an effect but if one object was to differ in shape, then it would. The same could go for resistance of the air choice. The resistance would be roughly the same for both objects since they are the same shape and weight, but if it was to differ it would have an effect. Is there an easy explanation someone could provide?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I strongly dislike this question. The constraints are vague and what kind of scientific term is "falling rate"? I might have answered choice #4!

The choice of correct answer tells us the constraints: the objects are shaped/sized so that drag force is a function of weight (and speed), meaning that at all times you'll end up with the same acceleration with differently weighted objects.
 
I agree with russ_waters. For example, the weight of the objects would certainly affect their falling rate, but not relative to each other is they are the same weight and shape. On #2, wouldn't they fall faster in a vacuum.

Bad question.
 
OldYat47 said:
but not relative to each other is they are the same weight and shape

but not relative to each other is they are the same weight and shape, and in an atmosphere

devoid of atmosphere, shape difference is irrelevant :smile:Dave
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K