Falling stick problem (no friction): What is the kinetic energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the kinetic energy of a falling stick without friction. It highlights that the kinetic energy should be the sum of rotational kinetic energy about the center of mass and translational kinetic energy of the center of mass. The absence of friction means there is no horizontal motion, simplifying the analysis. Participants emphasize the need for a clear problem statement to facilitate effective assistance. Overall, the kinetic energy expression involves both rotational and translational components under ideal conditions.
phos19
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Since there is no friction : $$ m \ddot{x} = 0 $$ (no x motion).For the kinetic energy , I've tried: $$ K = 1/2 I_{cm} \dot{\alpha}^2 + 1/2 m v^2_cm = 1/2 I_{cm} \dot{\alpha}^2 + 1/2 m \dot{z}^2$$ . Giving me a weird expression , shouldn't the kinetic energy just be half the the moment of inertia about the contact point times $$\dot{\alpha}^2$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
K.E would be sum of rotational and translational kinetic energy. Gravity is a conservative force, and if there's no air resistance and assuming that no energy dissipation happens due to heat and sound etc, then K.E of falling stick = Rotational K.E about it's Center of mass + Translational K.E of the center of mass.
 
If you are seeking help, please help us help you and provide a statement of the problem or ask a specific question. Most of us lack even the most basic mind reading skills.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top