FAQ article procedures/approval process

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mordred
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the approval process for a Redshift article intended as a reference but perceived more as an essay. There is a need for clarity on what constitutes supportive references and how to structure the article to meet FAQ standards. Suggestions include focusing on specific questions and providing concise answers, as well as referencing existing FAQs for related topics. The author acknowledges the effort involved and expresses a willingness to revise the article to better fit the FAQ format. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of adhering to forum guidelines for article submissions.
Mordred
Science Advisor
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
169
I have been writing an article on Redshift. My original intention was a reference article.
Article is located

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4312703#post4312703

I was wondering what the process is to set an article as a sticky thread.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks a lot for your suggestion. We will discuss this. Hopefully, we'll get back to you soon.
 
Thanks I will approve any needed corrections or editting that the MODS feel are suitable.
That is if the article meets the forum standards
 
I am nearly complete on this article. Current revision on page 7 same thread as above.

The question of number of supportive references came up.
For FAQ based reference. I would imagine there is a tighter definition of what counts as a reference. Some guidance on that would be helpful. Also what sections would the MODS feel need referencing. We have a rough list in the thread.
 
cristo said:
I've been busy for the last few weeks, and so haven't had much chance to look at this. First, I would like to applaud you for the time and effort you've put into this thread.

From the look of things, however, this does not appear to be a FAQ, but more an essay covering several topics. I see that you have included a list of questions at the beginning of the post, but it is not clear where (or if) these questions are answered in the article. You also ask some questions (liek the expansion faster than c question) that already have a FAQ dedicated to them. If you look at the other threads in the FAQ subforum, you will see each is in a thread of its own, with a well-defined question followed by a clear answer. I think if you want this to be a FAQ you need to follow a similar plan.

So, for example, which question do you think is the most important for a FAQ? Ask that question and then go about answering it. The article does not need to define everything to do with cosmology, you can assume that some things are known, and refer to other FAQ's for more information. You also need to include references.

Try to aim for a concise answer to a question, and it is likely to be much more useful to members who are new to the field wanting a quick answer or wanting to understand the topic in more detail


LOL judging from this I'd say I went into more than a little too much effort lol. Gonna take me a bit to get the article to conform to more of a FAQ than an essay. Assuming its possible lol.

Still I must admit I enjoyed writing it, the exercise taught me a lot in the way of little details, so either way I don't consider it a wasted effort.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Back
Top