Far infrared? Ceramics and pH? Magnetic therapy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the legitimacy of various therapeutic products that utilize magnetic fields, far infrared radiation, and pH-harmonizing ceramics. Participants express skepticism regarding the scientific basis of these claims and explore the potential for actual therapeutic effects versus marketing hype.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares an anecdote about a sales representative promoting a device that uses magnetic fields for health benefits, expressing skepticism about its effectiveness and the vague explanations provided.
  • Another participant mentions that there is no evidence supporting the therapeutic value of low-level magnetic fields, while noting that intense magnetic fields (around one Tesla) have shown some healing effects in specific contexts, such as MRI machines.
  • A third participant references studies indicating potential negative effects of time-varying magnetic fields on DNA in rats and neuronal cell growth, suggesting a complex relationship between magnetic fields and biological effects.
  • One participant humorously suggests that a copper bracelet is a cheaper alternative to magnets, asserting that magnets do not provide any benefits.
  • Another participant dismisses the claims as pseudoscience, suggesting that the products are marketed using tenuous connections to legitimate scientific experiments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the claims made regarding the therapeutic products, with multiple competing views on the effectiveness of magnetic therapy and the validity of the associated scientific literature. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the actual efficacy of these treatments.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the lack of rigorous scientific evidence supporting the claims made by proponents of these therapies, and there are references to specific studies that may not be directly applicable to the products discussed.

abhishek
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I'm posting this here because I don't know the legitimacy of the topic and whether it qualifies for discussion in the other physics sections.

Curious thing happened today that's got me wondering...

I met someone who represented a company that apparently sells healing and therapeutic products (though, tbh, I suspect they're really selling multi-level marketing). He presented some kind of device with a rotating magnet that "stabilised the body" and helped relieve aches, pains, etc. He mentioned that it was "a complete replacement for the medicine cabinet". (Already alarm bells were ringing in my head.)

I pressed him for details as to its workings but all he could tell me was something vague about magnetic fields and biochemical stability. He segued into other treatment devices they offered, including something that used far infrared radiation for further stability/harmony, and some ceramic that balanced pH levels in the bloodstream. :confused:

He said a lot about not knowing the technical workings of the products, and that he only has user experience as proof.

I told him I was sceptical, so he tried to demonstrate the rotating magnet device by doing some ridiculously uncontrolled/unfair testing that involved me trying to maintain posture/balance while he applied pressure by hand to dissuade my body from remaining upright. Must've been a funny sight for the neighbours. :-p

Apparently my "energy levels" were "better" (what does he mean?) after he waved the magic device over my back, and that's why I retained posture better after it.

I'm fairly convinced there's no substance to most of this. But I admit I have no factual knowledge that leads me to think so. What I'd like to know from the reasonable minds at PF is if there is some gem of truth among any of it. Even if there isn't, exactly what are these people supposedly claiming about far infrared radiation and pH-harmonising ceramics? I've never heard of it before. Could make for some amusing reading. :smile:

I do hear a lot about magnetic treatments and its applications in stuff like underlays in beds -- ads on TV mostly, nothing credible. Has this been properly tested and found to be effective, or is it simply over-marketed?

Thanks. :cool:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I looked into all of this when a guy at work was selling magnets and trying to recruit everyone. From what I have seen there is no evidence that low level magnetic fields provide any relief or therapeutic value. What I did see was that intense, varying magnetic fields - I believe on the order of one Tesla and a thousand hertz - have been shown to provide some sort of relief and can also aid healing in some cases, but this uses something like an MRI magnet which is about ten thousand times stronger than common magnets. The hyped magnet therapy literature mentioned the related medical benefits from an OHSU study, but nothing about the fact that you would need a magnet the size of a truck and rotating a thousand times a second. [values cited here are approximate but representative].
 
Last edited:
A copper bracelet is cheaper. It will eventually turn your wrist green, which is more than can be said for magnets - which do absolutely nothing.
 
Sounds like a bunch of psudo-science mumbo jumbo to me. Seems like their taking some of the exeriments mentioned by Ivan and using it as a nebulous connection to sell their products.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
50K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K