Faster than light-yes -but how?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a theoretical equation relating to the speed of a mini black hole formed from the mass and charge of a proton. The equation presented is G M/ 3 C^ 2 = K Q / 3 v ^ 2, with constants defined as G = 6.6 x 10^-11, k = 9.9 x 10^-9, M = 1.6 x 10^-27, Q = 1.6 x 10^-19, and C = 3 x 10^8. The calculated speed, v, is proposed to be 10^23 meters per second. The discussion critiques the validity of the formula and emphasizes the need for a rigorous approach to physics rather than speculative reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and black hole physics
  • Familiarity with fundamental constants: gravitational constant (G) and Coulomb's constant (k)
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics, specifically protons and electric charge
  • Mathematical proficiency in manipulating physical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Schwarzschild radius formula and its implications in black hole physics
  • Explore the relationship between mass, charge, and gravitational forces in particle physics
  • Investigate the concept of wave speeds in relation to electromagnetic and gravitational waves
  • Study the principles of general relativity and their applications to modern physics theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of black holes and the fundamental forces of nature.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
If you take the equation for the radius of the event horizon of a black hole and imagine that the mass of a proton is made from lots of tiny masses that form a mini black hole, and that the charge of the proton is made from mini charges that also from a black hole then:


G M/ 3 C^ 2 = K Q / 3 v ^ 2

putting in values for G the gravitational constant , 6.6 x 10^ -11, k the coulomb constant 9.9 x 10 ^ -9, M the mass = 1.6 x 10 ^ -27,
Q the electric charge = 1.6 x 10 ^ -19, C the speed of light = 3 x 10^8 and v is a new unknown speed, the value of v is 10^23 metresper second!

Whether or not you need nuclear power to get to this speed I couldn't say!
 
Science news on Phys.org
kurious said:
If you take the equation for the radius of the event horizon of a black hole and imagine that the mass of a proton is made from lots of tiny masses that form a mini black hole, and that the charge of the proton is made from mini charges that also from a black hole then:


G M/ 3 C^ 2 = K Q / 3 v ^ 2

putting in values for G the gravitational constant , 6.6 x 10^ -11, k the coulomb constant 9.9 x 10 ^ -9, M the mass = 1.6 x 10 ^ -27,
Q the electric charge = 1.6 x 10 ^ -19, C the speed of light = 3 x 10^8 and v is a new unknown speed, the value of v is 10^23 metresper second!

Whether or not you need nuclear power to get to this speed I couldn't say!

If you ask me, I think this is just the wrong way to do physics.
I don't understand how you got your formula.
 
Formula for schwarzschild radius should be 2GM/ c^2 but result for v is the same.
I am saying that charges could be masses with a bigger force constant and that just as general relativity which involves mass can be associated with the speed of light,
there would be a general relativity for charge which can be associated with another
wave speed.I am putting charge and mass on an equal footing.Relativity theory
likes things to be unbiased!
 
The problem is you can't just "imagine" those things, its like I say imagine if you didn't need friction to create power, then we could make a pepetual motion machine
 
No need to imagine - the equation only applies accurately to black holes but the wavespeed generated like the wavespeed associated with light would mean that the actual wave can wonder around the universe anywhere.
 
kurious said:
Imagine that the mass of a proton is made from lots of tiny masses that form a mini black hole, and that the charge of the proton is made from mini charges that also from a black hole then:

no need to imagine huh?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
445
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K