Is the speed of light constant?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the constancy of the speed of light, particularly whether it remains the same when measured from different frames of reference, such as a moving observer versus a stationary one. The scope includes theoretical implications and conceptual clarifications related to the principles of relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the speed of light is constant regardless of the observer's motion, suggesting a foundational belief in this postulate.
  • Another participant questions the rationale behind the constancy of the speed of light, indicating that it is accepted as an assumption due to its utility in predictive theories.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the speed of light quoted (3 x 10^8 m/s) applies specifically to a vacuum, and that light travels slower in other media, such as glass, where the refractive index affects its speed.
  • One participant clarifies that the original question assumes the light source or observer is moving, and according to relativity, the speed of light remains constant regardless of the motion of the source or observer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the constancy of the speed of light, particularly in relation to different frames of reference. There is no consensus reached, as some participants support the idea of constancy while others highlight the influence of the medium on light's speed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the assumptions regarding the constancy of the speed of light in various contexts, nor does it clarify the implications of relativity in detail.

TT0
Messages
210
Reaction score
3
Hello,

Is the speed of light constant at all speeds? So will the speed of light (3 x 10^8 m/s) be the same if a person was traveling at 1000 km/hr and if they were stationary.

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TT0 and axmls
Why?
 
As with most fundamental physical postulates, such as the postulates of gravitation and quantum mechanics, nobody knows why.

We choose to (provisionally) believe it and adopt it as an assumption because theories built on such assumptions have proven to be useful in predicting future observations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fanny and TT0
You will find about 83 gigabazillion threads on this subject here and in the relativity subforum. A few of these are linked in the "Similar discussions" section below, but if you search you'll find many more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TT0
TT0 said:
Is the speed of light constant at all speeds? So will the speed of light (3 x 10^8 m/s) be the same if a person was traveling at 1000 km/hr and if they were stationary.
Well, no. That speed you are quoting is in vacuum. In other media, the speed will be different.
The refractory index of glass for example tells us how much slower light travels in glass than in vacuum (standard glass has a refractory index of ≈1.5, so light travels with a speed of ≈2×108m/s in glass).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fanny and TT0
Svein said:
Well, no. That speed you are quoting is in vacuum. In other media, the speed will be different.
The refractory index of glass for example tells us how much slower light travels in glass than in vacuum (standard glass has a refractory index of ≈1.5, so light travels with a speed of ≈2×108m/s in glass).

you mis-interpreted the question ... was waiting for some one to do that :wink:

Andrew's answer, of YES, was correct in the context of the Q

TT0 said:
So will the speed of light (3 x 10^8 m/s) be the same if a person was traveling at 1000 km/hr and if they were stationary.

the question is assuming the light source or observer is a moving object, compared to a stationary source/observer.
eg ... so if the source is on a moving object 1000 km/hr in the example he gave is the speed of light from the source the same as if that source was stationary ... relativity says it is

c isn't 3 x 10^8 m/s + 277.78 m/s (1000 km/hr )
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TT0
Thank you everyone
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K