FAVRE-average: Compressible or just varying density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of FAVRE-averaging in fluid dynamics, particularly in modeling incompressible flows with variable density. It is established that FAVRE-averaging applies to any situation where density is not constant, regardless of whether the flow is compressible or incompressible. The participants clarify that the Reynolds average does not apply to incompressible fluids with variable density, as density variations affect the Reynolds number. The confusion between incompressibility and non-constant density is highlighted, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing these concepts in fluid dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RANS turbulence models
  • Knowledge of FAVRE-averaging and its applications
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number calculations
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics, including viscosity and density
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between FAVRE-averaging and Reynolds averaging
  • Study the implications of variable density on fluid viscosity
  • Learn about the application of RANS models in compressible versus incompressible flows
  • Explore the relationship between density variations and Reynolds number in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for fluid dynamics researchers, engineers working with turbulence modeling, and students studying advanced fluid mechanics concepts.

onestudent
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I am modelling a fluid flow that is incompressible and has variable density.
I am applying RANS turbulence models.
When deriving the equations for the mean flow when the denisity is non-constant using the Reynolds average, I do not get the same as the standard RANS-equations.
This even if I assume incompressibility.
But if I use the FAVRE-average, I get the FAVRE-equations.

My question:
Every time I read about FAVRE, it is reffered to compressible flow.
Is it not really "non-constant density", and not "compressible", that should be the condition for using FAVRE instead of Reynolds average?
I wonder if many mix up incompressibility and non-constant denisty, and say "incompressible" when they really mean "constant denisty".
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Favre averages apply to any situation in which density is not constant. This applies equally to both compressible flows and to flows that are incompressible but feature variable density anyway.
 
Thank you!

And also, the Reynolds average does not apply to the situation where the fluid in incompressible and features variable density, agree?
 
Do the density variations result in variations in the fluid viscosity, which is a key factor in determining the Reynolds number?
 
Viscosity is not dependent on density. However, the Reynolds number is dependent directly on density, so it would still change ##Re##. That said, this is all irrelevant to Favre and Reynolds averaging.
 
Yesterday at 11:38 PM#5
@boneh3ad , I generally find that you are accurate with all of your responses; but, I am confused by your above (#5) response because the basic formula for Re is: Re = V*D/ν where V = flow velocity; D = pipe inside diameter and v = Kinematic viscosity of the fluid.
 
Kinematic viscosity is the (dynamic) viscosity normalized by density.
\nu = \dfrac{\mu}{\rho}
So yes, kinematic viscosity clearly depends on density, by dynamic viscosity is usually what is meant by simply saying "viscosity". It is the one that is directly proportional to shear stress and is the more fundamental quantity.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K