Fermi distribution: Sum over states --> integral over states

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of sums into integrals in the context of Fermi distribution, specifically addressing a misunderstanding regarding the integration limits in k-space. The participant argues that their professor incorrectly integrates over all k-space, neglecting the physical constraint that quantum numbers cannot be negative. The correct approach involves integrating only over the positive octant of k-space, necessitating a multiplication by a factor of 1/8. This clarification is crucial for accurately calculating the total number of particles at zero temperature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Familiarity with k-space and quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Riemann sums and their relation to integrals
  • Basic concepts of periodic boundary conditions in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Fermi-Dirac distribution in detail
  • Learn about the implications of periodic boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical transition from sums to integrals in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the physical significance of k-space and its boundaries in particle systems
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in quantum mechanics, physicists working with statistical mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of Fermi distribution.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27

Homework Statement


http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~kolausen/TFY4230/.oldExams/17_eksdes12.en.pdf
solution: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~kolausen/TFY4230/.oldExams/18_losdes12.en.pdf

Look at problem 4a, formula (27) or the expression between (29) and (30).

My professor keeps converting sums into integrals in a manner I don't understand. In fact, I think he might be wrong and miss a factor of 1/8. OK let me explain what I mean:

For instance, when calculating the total number of particles ##N## by summing the number of particles per state, ##N_k##, at ##T=0## he does this:

$$N=\sum_k N_k = \sum_k ln(\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta( \mu + E_k}}) \rightarrow \int_0^{\infty} \frac{dk}{(2 \pi)^3/L^3} 4 \pi k^2 ln(\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta( \mu + E_k}})$$, where ##k_x = 2 \pi n_x/L##, ##k_y = 2 \pi n_y/L## and ##k_z = 2 \pi n_z/L##

OK, so he inserts a factor ## (\Delta k)^3 / (\Delta k)^3 ##, where ##\Delta k = 2 \pi /L##, into the sum, and since ##L## is very large the sum becomes a Riemann sum and thus can be rewritten into a volume-integral over the k-space.

BUT: my professor integrates over ALL of the volume in k-space, even for negative ##k_x##, ##k_y## and ##k_z##! That is unphysical, since neither ##n_x,n_y## or ##n_z## can be negative. In fact, the only legal way to integrate this is by integrating over the octant of space where all three k-axises are positive. Hence you must multiply the integral with a factor of ##1/8##, which my professor doesn't do .

Please help I have my exam on friday!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nikitin said:
That is unphysical, since neither ##n_x,n_y## or ##n_z## can be negative.
That is not correct. The problem statement itself mentions that the n's can be positive and negative. Note that the starting point is a particle in a box with periodic boundary conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nikitin
wow. this is embarrassing. OK thanks, problem solved..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K