Fermi energy of non relativistic electrons

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of non-relativistic electrons at absolute zero, specifically focusing on deriving the total energy in relation to the Fermi energy and the relationship between pressure and energy for a free Fermi gas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the relationship between total energy and Fermi energy, as well as the pressure-energy relationship, using different methods including partition functions and thermodynamic identities. Some participants question the validity of using classical statistical mechanics for quantum systems and explore the implications of integrating over energy limits that depend on volume.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various approaches to the problem, with some suggesting that the partition function can indeed yield the desired results. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical challenges faced by the original poster, and a recognition of the need to clarify the assumptions made regarding the Fermi energy and its implications for the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential complications arising from the dependence of the Fermi energy on volume and the appropriateness of using classical statistical mechanics equations in a quantum context. The discussion also highlights the need for careful evaluation of integrals in the derivation process.

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
we have non relativistic electrons at absolute zero. we need to show that the total energy is 3N*Ef/5 where Ef is the Fermi energy. this calculation I can do. we then need to show that the Pressure is equal to 2U/3V where U is the total energy. I did this by noting the dU=TdS - PdV and at absolute zero, S=0 therefore dS=0, so P = -dU/dV. using the explicit expression for U in terms of V you can get the required answer easily. I originally tried deriving this by finding the partition function for the fermions explicitly, then finding the helmholtz free energy, and then finding the pressure from this, using e.g
F=-Kb*T*ln(Zn)
however this method did not appear to work (it gave me very messy mathmatical expressions that did not look right). I'm not too sure why you can't get the answer this way. Is it because the equations for U,S,F in terms of the partition function only apply to Boltzmann statistics, and not quantum stats?

Sachi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You definitely can get the answer by directly using the partition function. In fact, it is possible to prove for any T that [tex]P = 2U/3V[/tex] for a free Fermi gas. I don't know what exactly you're referring to in terms of your messy math expressions, but at [tex]T=0[/tex] the partition function is a fairly simple object for free fermions. Perhaps you could be more specific about your trouble with the mathematics?
 
Just to add a little side note here :

Sachi, the partition function for non-interacting electrons is the same as that for the ideal gas. In 3-dimensions (for a non-interacting gas), the partition function goes like the volume times the cube of a Gaussian integral (in the limit of large Fermi energy). Perhaps, if you can't find where your error is, you could look back into your derivations for the ideal gas equation of state and specific heat.
 
the last post threw up some very interesting issues. for fermions at absolute zero we note that n(E)dE is equal to g(E)dE multiplied by two (to take into account the two different spins), where g(E)dE is the density of states. the problem with my initial method was that the integral goes from E=0 to Ef, where Ef is the Fermi energy, and this limit is itself a function of the Volume, so we have to explicitly evaluate the integral by doing integration by parts and stick in our expression for Ef at every stage which gets messy. the idea about assuming that Ef= infinity is interesting, because it would make the maths much easier, but it's not clear to me why this assumption is valid. there is also the problem that once the partition function has been derived (and is presumably similar to the one for a perfect gas), how do we convert the partition function into a pressure, as I'm pretty sure that the expressions for U,F,S e.g F=-NKbTln(Zn) only apply to classical and not Quantum stats.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K