Fermi Energy: Calculating Probabilities for Different Temperatures

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using the Fermi-Dirac probability function to calculate the occupancy probabilities of electronic states at various temperatures (150K, 300K, and 600K) and energy differences (E - EF). The formula used is F = 1 / (e^((E - EF) / (kT)) + 1), where k is the Boltzmann constant (8.62 x 10^-5 eV/K). Participants provided calculations for different energy levels, demonstrating that states below the Fermi energy are more than 50% occupied, while states above show significantly lower occupancy probabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Familiarity with the Boltzmann constant (8.62 x 10^-5 eV/K)
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics and temperature effects on particle occupancy
  • Proficiency in exponential functions and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Fermi-Dirac distribution function
  • Learn about the Boltzmann constant and its role in statistical mechanics
  • Explore temperature dependence in quantum statistics
  • Investigate applications of Fermi-Dirac statistics in semiconductor physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, or semiconductor physics, will benefit from this discussion on Fermi energy and occupancy probabilities.

orangeincup
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part 1) Use the fermi dirac probability function for t=150k, t=300k, and t=600k to fill in the table below.

Part 2) Also show a sample calculation for (e-ef)=0.06eV and T=300k.

Part 3)(Same as part 2?) Calculate the probabilities of a state at E -EF =0.06 eV being empty for T =150 K , T = 300 K , and T = 600 K .

Homework Equations


F=1/((e^((E-Ef)/T)+1)

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm just learning about this topic now so bare with me.
So for E-Ef =(-0.15) in the first row, and T=150k..

F=1/((e^((-0.15+1)/150)+1)*100
=49.86% for (-.150) at 150K

1/((e^((-0.15+1)/300)+1) * 100
=49.93% for (-.150) at 300K

1/((e^(-0.15+1)/600)+1)*100
=49.96% for (-.150) at 600k

That is the three values for row 1, -.150 E-Ef

Repeat with the rest of the values using the same formula, switching the (-.150) for the appropriate value in the chart.

For part 2, I'm a bit lost. So for a sample calculation, would it be 1/((e^((-0.06+1)/300)+1)? That comes out to be 49.99%.

Part 3) The way I'm reading it, it's asking for basically the same as part 2, except it wants when the state is empty and not filled? So would it be 100%- the probability of an electron being inside? Here's my calculation for it using that logic:

1/((e^((-0.06+1)/150)+1) * 100 = 49.84%
100%-49.84%=50.2% the state is empty
 

Attachments

  • ttable.png
    ttable.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 452
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you add 1 in the exponents?
I think the Boltzmann constant is missing there.

For energies below the Fermi energy, the states should be more than 50% occupied.

Part 2: Just write down the formulas you used for part 1 I think. Pay attention to the sign of the energy difference.

Part 3:
orangeincup said:
100%-49.84%=50.2% the state is empty
That's the correct approach, but the number has to get fixed.
 
I redid all my calculations using the Boltzmann constant

1/((e^((-0.15)/(150*(8.62*10^-5)))+1)
=99.99%

1/((e^((-0.15)/(150*(8.62*10^-5)))+1)
=99.7%
1/((e^((-0.15)/(600*(8.62*10^-5)))+1)
=94.79%

Part 2...
1/((e^((0.06)/(300*(8.62*10^-5)))+1) = 0.089
=8.90%?

Part 3...
1/((e^((0.06)/(150*(8.62*10^-5)))+1) = 0.00956
=0.956%? 100%-0.956%=99.04%

1/((e^((0.06)/(300*(8.62*10^-5)))+1) = .0895
100%-8.95% = 91.05%

1/((e^((0.06)/(600*(8.62*10^-5)))+1)=.2387
100%-23.87%=76.13%
 
Last edited:
Those numbers look much more realistic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K