kent davidge
- 931
- 56
Is it difficult to show that a Fermi-Walker "rotation" happens only in the plane formed by a particle four-acceleration and four-velocity?
The discussion revolves around the concept of Fermi-Walker transport, specifically addressing whether a Fermi-Walker "rotation" occurs solely within the plane defined by a particle's four-acceleration and four-velocity. Participants explore the implications of this transport in the context of theoretical physics.
Participants express differing views on the ease of demonstrating the plane of rotation for Fermi-Walker transport, with some asserting it is straightforward while others find it challenging. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity of the relationship between vectors and their transport in this context.
Some participants note the need for further exploration of the definitions and mathematical steps involved in Fermi-Walker transport, indicating potential limitations in the current understanding.
kent davidge said:Is it difficult to show that a Fermi-Walker "rotation" happens only in the plane formed by a particle four-acceleration and four-velocity?
I can't see directly from the definition. So I am trying to prove/show it. I guess we need to show that a vector in the plane formed by the four-acceleration and four-velocity, when rotated, still lies in the same plane. Correct?PeterDonis said:Since it follows directly from the definition of Fermi-Walker transport, I would say no.
kent davidge said:I can't see directly from the definition.
kent davidge said:I guess we need to show that a vector in the plane formed by the four-acceleration and four-velocity, when rotated, still lies in the same plane. Correct?
I find it hard to show that an infinitesimal Lorentz boost in the ##u-a## plane gives as a result your equation 1.8.5.vanhees71 said:You can find a derivation of Fermi-Walker transport in terms of old-fashioned Ricci calculus here:
https://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/srt.pdf