- #1

- 933

- 56

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter kent davidge
- Start date

- #1

- 933

- 56

- #2

- 35,330

- 13,533

Since it follows directly from the definition of Fermi-Walker transport, I would say no.

- #3

- 933

- 56

I can't see directly from the definition. So I am trying to prove/show it. I guess we need to show that a vector in the plane formed by the four-acceleration and four-velocity, when rotated, still lies in the same plane. Correct?Since it follows directly from the definition of Fermi-Walker transport, I would say no.

- #4

- 35,330

- 13,533

I can't see directly from the definition.

The definition is ##D_F X = 0##, where ##D_F## is the Fermi derivative and ##X## is a vector field. (I'm leaving out indexes since just looking schematically at the definition is enough.) The Fermi derivative along a worldline with tangent vector ##U## and proper acceleration ##A = \nabla_U U## is

$$

D_F X = \nabla_U X - \left( X \cdot A \right) U + \left( X \cdot U \right) A

$$

If we set ##D_F X = 0##, we get

$$

\nabla_U X = \left( X \cdot A \right) U - \left( X \cdot U \right) A

$$

which just says that the covariant derivative of ##X## along ##U##, which is what you are calling "Fermi-Walker rotation", lies in the plane spanned by ##U## and ##A##.

- #5

- 35,330

- 13,533

I guess we need to show that a vector in the plane formed by the four-acceleration and four-velocity, when rotated, still lies in the same plane. Correct?

No. You can Fermi-Walker transport any vector you like, even if it doesn't lie in the plane spanned by ##U## and ##A##. But the

- #6

- 18,642

- 9,487

https://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/srt.pdf

- #7

- 933

- 56

I find it hard to show that an infinitesimal Lorentz boost in the ##u-a## plane gives as a result your equation 1.8.5.

https://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/srt.pdf

- #8

- 18,642

- 9,487

This is discussed in the previous section (following Eq. (1.7.7)).

Share: