Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the application of Fermi's Golden Rule to perturbations that are not constant or sinusoidal, specifically considering the form V_0\left( \mathbf{x}\right)f\left(t\right) where f(t) may take on various forms, such as f(t) = e^{-a t}. Participants explore the implications of this on transition probabilities and the relevance of time-dependent perturbation theory.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants note that Fermi's Golden Rule is typically applied to constant or sinusoidal potentials and question how it can be adapted for non-sinusoidal functions like f(t) = e^{-a t}.
- One participant suggests considering the method of variation of constants, indicating that the probability is related to the absolute square of ##c_n^1##.
- Another participant emphasizes that Fermi's Golden Rule applies to transitions from discrete initial states to a continuum of final states, highlighting the importance of a well-defined energy E.
- Some participants advocate for the application of the general formalism of time-dependent perturbation theory as a way to address the question posed.
- There is a reiteration that the original question concerns the application of Fermi's Golden Rule, suggesting that the focus should remain on this aspect rather than on general perturbation theory.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the applicability of Fermi's Golden Rule to non-sinusoidal perturbations, with some advocating for the use of time-dependent perturbation theory while others emphasize the specific conditions under which Fermi's Golden Rule is valid. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the form of f(t) and its implications for transition probabilities. The discussion does not resolve how these assumptions affect the application of Fermi's Golden Rule.