Feynman diagram for ##\mu^+\mu^-## production in ##p\bar{p}## reaction

Click For Summary
In the discussion on Feynman diagrams for muon-antimuon production in proton-antiproton collisions, the main focus is on the interaction of quarks during the reaction. It is clarified that only two quarks from the proton and antiproton combine to produce a virtual photon, which then creates the muon pair. The fate of the remaining quarks is questioned, with the suggestion that they may form mesons, specifically whether they would result in two neutral pions or a charged and a neutral pion. The response indicates that both outcomes are likely, emphasizing the probabilistic nature of particle interactions. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of quark interactions in high-energy physics.
Nirmal Padwal
Messages
41
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Remembering that helicity is conserved at high energies,
a) Draw a typical diagram for ##\mu^+ \mu^-##-pair production, with an invariant mass around 30 GeV, in unpolarised ##p\bar{p}## collisions.
b) Derive an expression for the angular distribution (with respect to the ##\bar{p}## direction) of ##\mu^+## in the ##\mu^+\mu^-##, centre-of-mass system.
(Hint: You will need to look up the appropriate ##d^j_{m'm}## rotation matrix elements)
Relevant Equations
1) ##d^1_{11} = \frac{1}{2}(1+\cos\theta)##
2) ##d^1_{-11} = \frac{1}{2}(1-\cos\theta)##
I was able to solve b) but I am confused for a). I understand that in the proton-antiproton collision, only two quarks (one from proton and other from anti-proton) can be combined to get a virtual photon that in turn creates muon and anti-muon. I don't understand what would happen to the other quarks? Since single quarks cannot exist independently, I think maybe they combine to form mesons. Is that correct? But which meson? If I take ##u## and ##\bar{u}## from ##p## and ##\bar{p}## respectively (please check the feynman diagram below), I am still left with ##u,d,\bar{u},\bar{d}##. Do they combine to give two ##\pi^0##s or ##\pi^+\pi^-##?
pp collision feynman diag.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nirmal Padwal said:
Homework Statement:: Remembering that helicity is conserved at high energies,
a) Draw a typical diagram for ##\mu^+ \mu^-##-pair production, with an invariant mass around 30 GeV, in unpolarised ##p\bar{p}## collisions.
b) Derive an expression for the angular distribution (with respect to the ##\bar{p}## direction) of ##\mu^+## in the ##\mu^+\mu^-##, centre-of-mass system.
(Hint: You will need to look up the appropriate ##d^j_{m'm}## rotation matrix elements)
Relevant Equations:: 1) ##d^1_{11} = \frac{1}{2}(1+\cos\theta)##
2) ##d^1_{-11} = \frac{1}{2}(1-\cos\theta)##

I was able to solve b) but I am confused for a). I understand that in the proton-antiproton collision, only two quarks (one from proton and other from anti-proton) can be combined to get a virtual photon that in turn creates muon and anti-muon. I don't understand what would happen to the other quarks? Since single quarks cannot exist independently, I think maybe they combine to form mesons. Is that correct? But which meson? If I take ##u## and ##\bar{u}## from ##p## and ##\bar{p}## respectively (please check the feynman diagram below), I am still left with ##u,d,\bar{u},\bar{d}##. Do they combine to give two ##\pi^0##s or ##\pi^+\pi^-##?
View attachment 323288
It's not so much a matter of which happens, it's a matter of which is more likely. I haven't checked the tables but I would suspect that both versions are about equally probable

-Dan
 
I want to find the solution to the integral ##\theta = \int_0^{\theta}\frac{du}{\sqrt{(c-u^2 +2u^3)}}## I can see that ##\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} = A +Bu+Cu^2## is a Weierstrass elliptic function, which can be generated from ##\Large(\normalsize\frac{du}{d\theta}\Large)\normalsize^2 = c-u^2 +2u^3## (A = 0, B=-1, C=3) So does this make my integral an elliptic integral? I haven't been able to find a table of integrals anywhere which contains an integral of this form so I'm a bit stuck. TerryW

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K