Feynman explanation of gravitational energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Richard Feynman's explanation of gravitational potential energy and the concept of perpetual motion machines as presented in the Feynman Lectures on Physics. Feynman defines perpetual motion machines as systems that, after lifting and lowering weights, can perform net work without external energy input. Participants clarify that typical designs for such machines do not require additional weights during operation and emphasize that true perpetual motion is impossible due to energy conservation laws and frictional forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy
  • Familiarity with the concept of perpetual motion machines
  • Basic knowledge of energy conservation principles
  • Awareness of friction and its effects on mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the laws of thermodynamics and their implications on energy conservation
  • Explore the mechanics of simple machines and their efficiency
  • Research historical attempts to create perpetual motion machines and their failures
  • Learn about energy transfer in closed systems and its limitations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining energy concepts, and anyone interested in the principles of mechanics and energy conservation.

Michael Haddad
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Hello! I hope this is the proper forum for my question(s). English is not my native language, so I apologize in advance for language mistakes.

In Feynman Lectures on Physics, there is a chapter about the conservation of energy. The first part, which deals with the definition of energy, I understand quite well. Energy is an abstract mathematical concept; It is a quantity that must be calculated, it has many forms, and in total - it never changes.

In the next part of the article, Feynman discusses the various forms of energy, in particular - gravitational potential energy. He opens the discussion on gravitational potential energy with a number of statements about weight-lifting machines, especially - perpetual motion weight-lifting machines.

To rule out the existence of perpetual motion machines, Feynman begins with the definition of perpetual motion:
...If, when we have lifted and lowered a lot of weights and restored the machine to the original condition, we find that the net result is to have lifted a weight, then we have a perpetual motion machine because we can use that lifted weight to run something else. That is, provided the machine which lifted the weight is brought back to its exact original condition, and furthermore that it is completely self-contained—that it has not received the energy to lift that weight from some external source...

So here are my questions (I will probably have more when you will answer those two :smile:):
  1. What does "...when we have lifted and lowered a lot of weights..." mean? If it means that we have added weights to the machine, doesn't it mean that we put energy into the system? Doesn't it contradicts with "it has not received the energy to lift that weight from some external source"?
  2. "...raised and lowered a lot of weights..." suggests that the process is repeated several times. How is that possible? Suppose we have on one side of the machine 5kg, and on the other side 1kg. The scale with 5kg will be lowered, and the scale with 1kg will be lifted (provided that the axis is located in the center of the scales). The final state of this process is 1kg up and 5kg down. How can the machine continue the process and miraculously lift the 5kg?
Thank you very much!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rishi Raj and (deleted member)
Physics news on Phys.org
The machine receives energy to lift the weight from an internal source (the self-contained requirement).
 
Michael Haddad said:
  1. What does "...when we have lifted and lowered a lot of weights..." mean? If it means that we have added weights to the machine, doesn't it mean that we put energy into the system?

  1. "...raised and lowered a lot of weights..." suggests that the process is repeated several times. How is that possible?

1. Typical designs for perpetual motion machines include weights as part of the machinery. They don't require that weights be added as the machine runs.

2. It isn't possible. "Frictionless" machinery could lift one weight while lowering another weight and doing no net work. "Perpetual motion" machines claim to do more than this. They claim to accomplish some net work after returning to their original state. Feynman is stating the claims that people make for perpetual motion machines. He isn't saying these claims are valid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K