Feynman Lectures: The Random Walk Explained

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a challenging section of Feynman's Lectures on Physics, specifically regarding the concepts of random walks and the implications of certain equations. The user expresses confusion over the meaning of equation 41.19 and the statement that the average of ⟨x v_x⟩ does not change. There is also uncertainty about why ⟨x F_x⟩ equals zero. Responses suggest that understanding these concepts may require considering their implications and definitions more deeply, and that Feynman's lectures may be more beneficial when paired with contemporary physics texts. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of Feynman's explanations and the need for additional resources to grasp the material fully.
luuurey
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
There is a chapter in Feynman Lectures on Physics called The Random Walk(41-4). I understand everything till the paragraph right after equation 41.18. I have no idea what he is trying to say. There is an equation 41.19, which is diff. eq. for object that is forced and is in a environment that causes resistance... that is not eq. of particle in a gas. Than he is saying that average of \left\langle x v_x \right\rangle does not change because it doesn't remember where it was before.. I don't understand that formulation. I am also not sure why \left\langle x F_x \right\rangle = 0.

Could someone help me please ?
Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Feynman lectures were not very effective when Feynman was giving them - they tend to the over-clever - I don't think they are that great now. You are best advised to read them alongside or after a more contemporary text... they tend to work best as a refresher course for people who have already done the basic physics by another method.

However, your questions can be approached by considering the converse. i.e. what does it mean for <xF> not zero, and <xv> not constant? What do xv and xF measure?
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
681
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K