Field and force with three charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the location of charge q1 due to charge q2 using Coulomb's Law. The user initially miscalculated the position conversion from centimeters to meters, which led to an incorrect result. The correct conversion is crucial, as 4 cm should be represented as 0.04 m. The user received clarification on the unit vector direction and acknowledged the mistake in conversion. Accurate unit conversion is essential for obtaining the correct electric field value.
Squall
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At a particular moment, three small charged balls, one negative and two positive,are located as shown in the figure. q1 = 3 nC, q2 = 7 nC, and q3 = -5 nC.

What is the electric field at the location of Q1, due to Q2?

y
q1
|
|
|
q2______q3____x

Okay that is the given diagram the if q2 is at (0,0) then q1 is at (0,4); q3 at (3,0);
and the distances are in centimeters

Homework Equations



I'm using Coulomb's Law which states that E = 9e9*(q/r^2)r-hat

The Attempt at a Solution



So I thought all I have to do is plug in the values

[9e9*(7e-9/(.004)^2)]*<0,4,0> = <0,3937500,0>N/C

please help me, I've been staring at this for a while and I cannot figure out why I don't get the right answer, I shouldn't have to consider the other charges because they don't affect the field created by q2 just the net field, so why is this not correct I have no idea.

Thanks Again for all the help guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what units are the components of the position?

ehild
 
The components of the positions are in centimeters. (cm)
 
If so, 4 cm = 0.04 m. And you have to use the unit vector in the direction of <0,4,0>.

ehild
 
Oh yes your right, I just kept converting the cm to m wrong, putting an extra zero in front of it like they were mm or something. Thank You so much it really helps having someone else look at this. I knew I had to be making some stupid mistake.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top