Field Extensions - Lovett, Theorem 7.1.10 .... ....

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Theorem 7.1.10 from "Abstract Algebra: Structures and Applications" by Stephen Lovett, specifically addressing the irreducibility of a polynomial \( p(x) \) in the context of field extensions. The confusion arises from the assertion that if \( p(\alpha) = 0 \), then \( p(x) \) must have a linear factor \( x - \alpha \) in \( F[x] \). Peter clarifies that if \( \alpha \notin F \), then \( x - \alpha \) is not a polynomial in \( F[x] \), and thus \( p(x) \) can still be irreducible in \( F[x] \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field extensions and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial irreducibility in the context of abstract algebra
  • Knowledge of the notation and concepts related to polynomials, such as \( p(x) \) and roots
  • Basic comprehension of the structure of fields and field extensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of irreducibility in polynomial rings, particularly in \( F[x] \)
  • Explore field extensions and their implications on polynomial roots
  • Review examples of polynomials that are irreducible over specific fields
  • Learn about the implications of the degree of field extensions on polynomial factors
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and educators in abstract algebra, particularly those studying field theory and polynomial irreducibility. It is also useful for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between field elements and polynomial factors.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Abstract Algebra: Structures and Applications" by Stephen Lovett ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 7: Field Extensions ... ...

I need help with an aspect of the proof of Theorem 7.1.10 ...Theorem 7.1.10, and the start of its proof, reads as follows:
View attachment 6575In the above text from Lovett we read the following ...

" ... ... Let $$p(x)$$ be a polynomial of least degree such that $$p( \alpha ) = 0$$ ... ... "Then Lovett goes on to prove that $$p(x)$$ is irreducible in $$F[x]$$ ... ...... BUT ... I am confused by this since it is my understanding that if $$p( \alpha ) = 0$$ then $$p(x)$$ has a linear factor $$x - \alpha$$ in $$F[x]$$ and so is not irreducible ... ... ?Can someone please help clarify this issue ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $\alpha\notin F$, $x - \alpha$ is not a polynomial in $F[x]$, so it cannot be a linear factor of $p(x)$ in $F[x]$. The condition $[F(\alpha):F] > 1$ holds if and only if $\alpha \in F$.
 
Euge said:
If $\alpha\notin F$, $x - \alpha$ is not a polynomial in $F[x]$, so it cannot be a linear factor of $p(x)$ in $F[x]$. The condition $[F(\alpha):F] > 1$ holds if and only if $\alpha \in F$.
Thanks for the help, Euge

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K