MHB Field Extensions - Remarks by Lovett - Page 326 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Abstract Algebra: Structures and Applications" by Stephen Lovett ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 7: Field Extensions ... ...

I need help with some remarks of Lovett following Theorem 7.1.12 and Example 7.1.13 on page 326 ...The remarks by Lovett read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6589
In the above remarks from Lovett, we read the following:

" ... ... In the quotient ring $$K$$, this implies that $$\overline{ a(x) q(x) } = 1$$. Thus in $$K, \ a( \alpha ) q( \alpha ) = 1$$. ... ... "My question is as follows:

Can someone please explain exactly why/how $$\overline{ a(x) q(x) } = 1$$ implies that $$a( \alpha ) q( \alpha ) = 1$$ ... ... ?Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't help with your question, but out of curiosity, how are you uploading your snippets of the various literature you upload? I'm going to guess they are photocopies.

I can recommend smartphone applications which will allow you to get a clear, more definitive black/white render of your image if you are interested! Also saves the headache of using a printer, if that's what you are doing..
 
Hi Peter,

If $\overline{a(x)q(x)} = 1$, then $a(x)q(x) - 1 \in (p(x))$, so then $a(x)q(x) - 1 = f(x)p(x)$ for some $f(x)\in F[x]$. Evaluating at $\alpha$, $a(\alpha)q(\alpha) - 1 = f(\alpha)p(\alpha) = f(\alpha)(0) = 0$. Hence, $a(\alpha)q(\alpha) = 1$.
 
Joppy said:
I can't help with your question, but out of curiosity, how are you uploading your snippets of the various literature you upload? I'm going to guess they are photocopies.

I can recommend smartphone applications which will allow you to get a clear, more definitive black/white render of your image if you are interested! Also saves the headache of using a printer, if that's what you are doing..
Hi Joppy,

I just scan the relevant textbook page and the select the relevant text ... then I use IrfanView to reduce the file size and convert to PNG format ... works Ok and is not very onerous ...

Peter

- - - Updated - - -

Euge said:
Hi Peter,

If $\overline{a(x)q(x)} = 1$, then $a(x)q(x) - 1 \in (p(x))$, so then $a(x)q(x) - 1 = f(x)p(x)$ for some $f(x)\in F[x]$. Evaluating at $\alpha$, $a(\alpha)q(\alpha) - 1 = f(\alpha)p(\alpha) = f(\alpha)(0) = 0$. Hence, $a(\alpha)q(\alpha) = 1$.
oh ... of course ...

Thanks Euge ...

Peter
 
Peter said:
Hi Joppy,

I just scan the relevant textbook page and the select the relevant text ... then I use IrfanView to reduce the file size and convert to PNG format ... works Ok and is not very onerous ...

Peter

Cool, just thought id mention it. ScannerPro is an app that syncs with Dropbox and allows you to easily crop and scale your images. The most important aspect being that you get much better coloration of your images (blacker blacks, whiter whites).
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top