Field lines near the equilibrium point

In summary: The potential due to the two charges is θ(x,y)=(1/(sqrt((x-2)2+y2)-(1/sqrt((x-1)2+y2)))At locations in the xy plane, the potential is θ(x,y)=(1/(sqrt((x-2)2+y2)-(1/sqrt((x-
  • #1
scotshocker
6
0

Homework Statement



Charges 4q and -q are located at the points (-2a,0,0) and (-a,0,0), respectively. Write down the potential θ(x,y) for points in the xy plane, and then use a Taylor expansion to find an approximate expression for θ near the origin, which you can quickly show is the equilibrium point. (You can set a=1 to make things simpler)

Homework Equations


θ(x,y,s)=∫(ρ(x',y',z')dx'dy'dz')/4πεr


The Attempt at a Solution


setting a-1, ignoring the factor of q/4πε0, the potential due to the two charges, at locations in the xy plane is θ(x,y)=(1/(sqrt((x-2)2+y2)-(1/sqrt((x-1)2+y2)

Have I set this equation up correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF;
Have I set this equation up correctly?
... how would you check?

i.e. is the equilibrium point at the origin as the problem says?
(Notice that one of the charges is much bigger than the other? Have you accounted for that?)

Have you checked that you have added the vectors properly - say, by sketching them out head-to-tail?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Hello, scotshocker. Welcome to PF!

ignoring the factor of q/4πε0, the potential due to the two charges, at locations in the xy plane is
θ(x,y)=(1/(sqrt((x-2)2+y2)-(1/sqrt((x-1)2+y2)

Have I set this equation up correctly?

Looks good except for a couple of signs. At what values of x would you expect the potential to be undefined?
[EDIT: And as Simon points out, the charges are not of equal magnitude.]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
The fact that the one charge is larger than the other is the part that I am having trouble with. I am also confusing myself because both charges are on the same side of the origin. I am severely out of practice and am just trying to figure this out. Any suggestions?
 
  • #5
The charges are also opposite signs.
Perhaps you'd better write down the equation for the potential along just the x-axis to start with - don't leave off the q and the a this time: I think you removed them too soon, before you understood the situation.
Once you see that, you'll probably make the connections you need.

Actually draw the axes - mark out x=0, x=+a, x=+2a, x=-a, x=-2a, etc.
 

FAQ: Field lines near the equilibrium point

What is the equilibrium point in the context of field lines?

The equilibrium point in the context of field lines refers to a point where the direction of the electric or magnetic field is zero. This means that the net force acting on a charged particle or a magnetic pole at this point is also zero.

How can the behavior of field lines near the equilibrium point be described?

The behavior of field lines near the equilibrium point can be described as either converging or diverging. In the case of electric fields, the field lines converge towards the equilibrium point from all directions. In the case of magnetic fields, the field lines diverge away from the equilibrium point in all directions.

What happens to the field lines near the equilibrium point when a charged particle or magnetic pole is present?

When a charged particle or magnetic pole is present near the equilibrium point, the field lines will be affected by its presence. In the case of electric fields, the field lines will be deflected towards or away from the particle depending on its charge. In the case of magnetic fields, the field lines will form closed loops around the pole.

Can field lines cross each other near the equilibrium point?

No, field lines cannot cross each other near the equilibrium point. This is because the direction of the field is determined by the tangent to the field line, and if two field lines were to cross, there would be two different directions at the same point, which is not possible.

How do field lines near the equilibrium point relate to the strength of the electric or magnetic field?

The spacing and density of field lines near the equilibrium point can give an indication of the strength of the electric or magnetic field. The closer together the field lines are, the stronger the field is at that point. Additionally, the number of field lines passing through a given area is also a measure of the strength of the field.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
319
Replies
69
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top