1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Field Theory: Prove transformations are a symmetry

  1. Nov 6, 2014 #1
    The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Consider the lagrangian [tex] L=\delta_\mu \phi \delta^\mu \phi^* - m^2 \phi \phi^* [/tex]

    Show that the transformation:
    [tex] \phi \rightarrow \phi + a \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \phi^* \rightarrow \phi^* + a^* [/tex]
    is symmetry when m=0.

    The attempt at a solution
    Substituting the transformation into the lagrangian gives:
    [tex] L=\delta_\mu ( \phi + a ) \delta^\mu ( \phi^* + a^* )- m^2 (\phi + a) ( \phi^* + a^*) [/tex]
    [tex] = (\delta_\mu \phi + \delta_\mu a) ( \delta^\mu \phi^* + \delta^\mu a^*) - m^2 ( \phi \phi^* + a^* \phi + a \phi^* + aa^*) [/tex]

    I know that this is a symmetry when the action is invariant, so the langrangian is invariant up to a total derivative. [itex] L \rightarrow L + \delta_\mu J^\mu [/itex]

    I can't see how I could rewrite the above expression so that [itex] L \rightarrow L + \delta_\mu J^\mu [/itex] . Obviously the second term vanishes with m=0, but expanding the first gives:
    [tex] L = \delta_\mu \phi \delta^\mu \phi^* + \delta_\mu a \delta^\mu a^* + \delta_\mu a \delta^\mu \phi^* + \delta_\mu \phi \delta^\mu a^* [/tex]
    meaning the total derivative would have to be
    [tex] \delta_\mu J^\mu = \delta_\mu a \delta^\mu a^* + \delta_\mu a \delta^\mu \phi^* + \delta_\mu \phi \delta^\mu a^* [/tex]
    which is a form I can't rewrite it in to (what would [itex] J^\mu [/itex] be?)

    The only solution I can see would be for a & a* to be independent of spacetime, so that [itex] \delta_\mu a = \delta^\mu a^* = 0 [/itex] , but other than answering the question I don't know if there is any justification in saying that.

    So, are a/a* independent of spacetime, or should I be able to rearrange the above to form a total derivative term? Or am I missing something else completely?

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 6, 2014 #2

    nrqed

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Ye
    Yes, "a" is a constant (independent of x). In the absence of gravity, that's all we can do. If we include gravity (by working withe formalism of GR and introducing the metric), then one may make space-time transformations local.
     
  4. Nov 6, 2014 #3
    Great, thanks.
    Is there a way to justify that a is a constant from the notation? (I assume not as there is no notation here to signify the dependence of [itex] \phi [/itex] on X, but the question does not explicitly say a has no dependence)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Field Theory: Prove transformations are a symmetry
Loading...