EPR
- 440
- 104
What is a measurement? Is every interaction a measurement?
No one can tell.
No one can tell.
vanhees71 said:In the paragraph right at the page break between pp 2-3.
vanhees71 said:A bit later in the paper Eq. (7) shows that for ##t \rightarrow \infty## you realize the projection
vanhees71 said:It takes time to "measure"
vanhees71 said:increasing ##\Omega## (via the intensity of the laser) you get closer and closer to the ideal projection. That's what they want to demonstrate, and in my opinion they have done so.
As @samalkhaiat recently said in another thread, it's a mess so let me clarify this once and for all.vanhees71 said:There are no quantum jumps, at least not in standard quantum mechanics. It is an old ad-hoc description of the emission and absorption of photons in the Bohr atom model by electrons jumping between different allowed orbits. Today we describe it dynamically, often sufficiently in first-order perturbation theory with an external classical em. field (semi-classical approximation), which describes of course only induced emission and absorption or the quanum em. field, which includes spontaneous emission too.
I can, no it isn't.EPR said:Is every interaction a measurement?
No one can tell.
vanhees71 said:They say clearly what was filmed in the paper.
vanhees71 said:You are also not interested in the specific mathematical description of the inner workings of your digital voltmeter when measuring a voltage.
No, you can't. It is your personal opinion.Demystifier said:I can, no it isn't.
EPR said:In the MWI every interaction is a measurement.
I just did.EPR said:No, you can't.
Ok, at least I now know, what you mean by measurement: You call only a process a measurement, where the quantum system interacts with a macroscopic measurement device which stores the result irreversably. That I can agree with. Then in the here discussed paper, what they call a "measurement" is indeed a "preparation procedure" and only the detection of the fluorescence photons is the measurement. So what's demonstrated here is the time-dependence of a preparation procedure leading in the limit of high intensity of the 422nm laser field to a preparation procedure as in what's commonly called a "von Neumann filter measurement". All this nitpicking on words is not that important, because it's clear from the description of the experiment what's meant by the words.PeterDonis said:Measuring a voltage is a classical process so it is a bad example.
If I am doing a double slit experiment with a photon, I don't call the effect of the slits on the photon a "measurement". The measurement is when the photon hits the detector screen and makes a dot. Nobody has a specific mathematical description of this either, the mathematical description is all about the effect of the slits, but that doesn't mean the effect of the slits on the photon is the measurement.
vanhees71 said:You call only a process a measurement, where the quantum system interacts with a macroscopic measurement device which stores the result irreversably.
vanhees71 said:All this nitpicking on words is not that important, because it's clear from the description of the experiment what's meant by the words.