Final charge on capacitor for an RC circuit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the final charge of a capacitor in an RC circuit, specifically analyzing the equation q = CE(1 - e^{-t/RC}). Participants clarify that this equation is only valid when the capacitor is directly connected to the voltage source. When connected to a resistor, such as R2, the voltages across the capacitor and R2 are equal, and current continues to flow through the resistors in a closed loop. The conclusion emphasizes that in a stationary state, no current flows through the capacitor, effectively treating it as an open circuit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC circuits and capacitor behavior
  • Familiarity with the equation q = CE(1 - e^{-t/RC})
  • Knowledge of Ohm's Law and current-voltage relationships
  • Basic principles of circuit analysis, including series and parallel connections
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the behavior of capacitors in series and parallel configurations
  • Learn about transient analysis in RC circuits
  • Explore the implications of Kirchhoff's laws in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the effects of different resistor values on capacitor charging times
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those studying circuit theory and capacitor applications in RC circuits.

unseeingdog
Messages
16
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


upload_2017-5-29_14-23-29.png

Homework Equations


##q = CE(1 - e^{-t/RC})##

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that, since the problem specifies that sufficient time has passed, it meant to say that enough time passed. thus making the exponential term in the equation go down to 0, and the charge in the capacitor simply ##CE##, but the book says the answer is (f), and I don't have any idea how.

P.S: Sorry for the title, I accidentally wrote "Optics", and now it seems I can't change it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no problem statement, and your image is essentially empty.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
gneill said:
There's no problem statement, and your image is essentially empty.
Sorry, I'm trying to fix it. Something went wrong with the attachment
 
unseeingdog said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 204491

Homework Equations


##q = CE(1 - e^{-t/RC})##
The equation is not true if the capacitor is not connected directly to the source.
The capacitor is connected to the resistor R2. How is the capacitor voltage related to the voltage across R2?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
unseeingdog said:
P.S: Sorry for the title, I accidentally wrote "Optics", and now it seems I can't change it.
I've fixed your title for you :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
gneill said:
I've fixed your title for you :smile:
Oh, great! Thanks.
 
ehild said:
The equation is not true if the capacitor is not connected directly to the source.
The capacitor is connected to the resistor R2. How is the capacitor voltage related to the voltage across R2?
Are they equal? Wouldn't the voltage in ##R_2## eventually drop to 0 because of the current going down, or does that equation for the current also not apply?
 
unseeingdog said:
Are they equal? Wouldn't the voltage in ##R_2## eventually drop to 0 because of the current going down, or does that equation for the current also not apply?
Yes, the voltages are equal as the capacitor and R2 are connected parallel. But why do you think that the current is zero through R2? The source, the two resistors and the switch make a closed loop. Current will flow forever through the resistors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
ehild said:
Yes, the voltages are equal as the capacitor and R2 are connected parallel. But why do you think that the current is zero through R2? The source, the two resistors and the switch make a closed loop. Current will flow forever through the resistors.
I thought so because of the equation for the current, namely ##i =\left(\frac E R \right) (e^{-t/RC})##, but I suppose that one doesn't apply either, since it's derived from the other one I mentioned.
 
  • #10
Nevermind. It was a million times easier than I thought. I just had to do ##iR_2 = \frac q C##, ##i## being ##\ \frac {E}{R_1 + R_2}##. Thanks for the help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
  • #11
unseeingdog said:
Nevermind. It was a million times easier than I thought. I just had to do ##iR_2 = \frac q C##, ##i## being ##\left (\frac {E}{R_1 + R_2} \right)##. Thanks for the help.

Correct, as no current flows through the capacitor in stationary state, after the switch is closed for a long time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
  • #12
unseeingdog said:
I thought so because of the equation for the current, namely ##i =\left(\frac E R \right) (e^{-t/RC})##, but I suppose that one doesn't apply either, since it's derived from the other one I mentioned.

That would be if a capacitor and resistor are in series with a voltage source. Think about this: when a capacitor has no current flowing through it, it essentially acts as an open circuit. So what is the voltage across R2 if the capacitor is just an open circuit?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K