Final charge on capacitor for an RC circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the final charge on a capacitor in an RC circuit, specifically addressing the behavior of the capacitor when connected to resistors and the implications of time on the charge equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the capacitor and resistor voltages, questioning the validity of the charge equation under different circuit configurations. There are attempts to clarify the implications of time on the capacitor's charge and current flow through the circuit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the assumptions made regarding the circuit configuration and the behavior of current and voltage in the system. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the capacitor and resistor voltages, but no consensus has been reached on the implications of these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem statement is incomplete, and there are discussions about the effects of time on the circuit's behavior, particularly in relation to the capacitor's charge and current flow.

unseeingdog
Messages
16
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


upload_2017-5-29_14-23-29.png

Homework Equations


##q = CE(1 - e^{-t/RC})##

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that, since the problem specifies that sufficient time has passed, it meant to say that enough time passed. thus making the exponential term in the equation go down to 0, and the charge in the capacitor simply ##CE##, but the book says the answer is (f), and I don't have any idea how.

P.S: Sorry for the title, I accidentally wrote "Optics", and now it seems I can't change it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no problem statement, and your image is essentially empty.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
gneill said:
There's no problem statement, and your image is essentially empty.
Sorry, I'm trying to fix it. Something went wrong with the attachment
 
unseeingdog said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 204491

Homework Equations


##q = CE(1 - e^{-t/RC})##
The equation is not true if the capacitor is not connected directly to the source.
The capacitor is connected to the resistor R2. How is the capacitor voltage related to the voltage across R2?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
unseeingdog said:
P.S: Sorry for the title, I accidentally wrote "Optics", and now it seems I can't change it.
I've fixed your title for you :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
gneill said:
I've fixed your title for you :smile:
Oh, great! Thanks.
 
ehild said:
The equation is not true if the capacitor is not connected directly to the source.
The capacitor is connected to the resistor R2. How is the capacitor voltage related to the voltage across R2?
Are they equal? Wouldn't the voltage in ##R_2## eventually drop to 0 because of the current going down, or does that equation for the current also not apply?
 
unseeingdog said:
Are they equal? Wouldn't the voltage in ##R_2## eventually drop to 0 because of the current going down, or does that equation for the current also not apply?
Yes, the voltages are equal as the capacitor and R2 are connected parallel. But why do you think that the current is zero through R2? The source, the two resistors and the switch make a closed loop. Current will flow forever through the resistors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
ehild said:
Yes, the voltages are equal as the capacitor and R2 are connected parallel. But why do you think that the current is zero through R2? The source, the two resistors and the switch make a closed loop. Current will flow forever through the resistors.
I thought so because of the equation for the current, namely ##i =\left(\frac E R \right) (e^{-t/RC})##, but I suppose that one doesn't apply either, since it's derived from the other one I mentioned.
 
  • #10
Nevermind. It was a million times easier than I thought. I just had to do ##iR_2 = \frac q C##, ##i## being ##\ \frac {E}{R_1 + R_2}##. Thanks for the help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
  • #11
unseeingdog said:
Nevermind. It was a million times easier than I thought. I just had to do ##iR_2 = \frac q C##, ##i## being ##\left (\frac {E}{R_1 + R_2} \right)##. Thanks for the help.

Correct, as no current flows through the capacitor in stationary state, after the switch is closed for a long time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog
  • #12
unseeingdog said:
I thought so because of the equation for the current, namely ##i =\left(\frac E R \right) (e^{-t/RC})##, but I suppose that one doesn't apply either, since it's derived from the other one I mentioned.

That would be if a capacitor and resistor are in series with a voltage source. Think about this: when a capacitor has no current flowing through it, it essentially acts as an open circuit. So what is the voltage across R2 if the capacitor is just an open circuit?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unseeingdog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K