Final Speed of a Proton and Electron

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the speeds of a proton and an electron when accelerated through an electric potential difference of 121 V. Participants explore the implications of charge sign on energy equations and the behavior of particles in an electric field.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differences in energy equations for protons and electrons, questioning why the equations appear to reverse potential energy roles. There is confusion regarding the electron's behavior in an electric field and whether it requires initial kinetic energy to gain speed.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications about the nature of electric potential and energy conservation. Some participants suggest reconsidering the assumptions about the signs of potential differences and the implications for the motion of charged particles.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of specification regarding the sign of the potential difference in the problem statement, which has led to varied interpretations. Additionally, the potential need to consider relativistic effects for the electron is mentioned, indicating a possible complexity in the calculations.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


(a) Calculate the speed of a proton that is accelerated from rest through an electric potential difference of 121 V.

(b) Calculate the speed of an electron that is accelerated through the same potential difference.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I actually understand how to solve this particular problem, for the most part; when it comes to calculating the speed of the electron, there is one detail that confuses me: " The electron, since it has a negative charge, gains speed moving from Vi = 0 to Vf = 121 V. Why does the electron exclusively gain speed while moving in an electric field where Vi = 0 to a point in the field where Vf = 121? Why can't the proton also do this?

EDIT: For the proton, the conditions are: 0 + qV_i = 1/2m_pv_p^2 + 0

For the electron, the conditions are:[STRIKE] [STRIKE] 0 + 0 = 1/2m_ev_e^2 + eV_f[/STRIKE] [/STRIKE]

Why do the equations differ so much? Why do they reverse the potential energy in each case?

EDIT: Conditions for the electron: 0 + 0 = 1/2m_ev_e^2 - eV_f
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem does not specify the sign of the potential difference. Assume for the electron the potential difference is + and for the protn it's -.

You might have to consider relativity, particularly for the electron, since it's going to be zinging along at a good clip. My offhand guess is not, especially if you haven't covered relativity in your work thus far.
 
To put it another way, electrons like to roll up potential hills while protons like to roll down potential hills. So the question is asking you to compare the speed of the electron at the top of the hill with the speed of the proton at the bottom of the hill.

In terms of the math, what you get is
\begin{align*}
K_i + U_i &= K_f + U_f \\
0 + eV_\text{top} &= \frac{1}{2}m_p v_p^2 + eV_\text{bottom} \\
0 + (-e)V_\text{bottom} &= \frac{1}{2}m_e v_e^2 + (-e)V_\text{top}
\end{align*} where ##V_\text{top}-V_\text{bottom}=121\text{ V}## and ##e = +1.6\times 10^{-19}\text{ C}##.
 
vela said:
To put it another way, electrons like to roll up potential hills while protons like to roll down potential hills. So the question is asking you to compare the speed of the electron at the top of the hill with the speed of the proton at the bottom of the hill.

In terms of the math, what you get is
\begin{align*}
K_i + U_i &= K_f + U_f \\
0 + eV_\text{top} &= \frac{1}{2}m_p v_p^2 + eV_\text{bottom} \\
0 + (-e)V_\text{bottom} &= \frac{1}{2}m_e v_e^2 + (-e)V_\text{top}
\end{align*} where ##V_\text{top}-V_\text{bottom}=121\text{ V}## and ##e = +1.6\times 10^{-19}\text{ C}##.

Yes, but to roll up a hill, wouldn't you need initial kinetic energy?
 
Looking back, I see that I wrote the conservation of energy equation wrong for the electron. I'll fix that.
 
Bashyboy said:
Yes, but to roll up a hill, wouldn't you need initial kinetic energy?

You are taking this too literally. Electricity, unlike gravity, is of two kinds, one kind always eager to go uphill.
 
You need kinetic energy to roll up a potential energy hill, but that's not what's going on here. The electron is rolling up an electric potential hill. Because of its negative charge, an electron's potential energy decreases as it moves to higher electric potential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K