- #71
Pengwuino
Gold Member
- 5,124
- 20
HEY! The ultimate experiment! Bring a cat on the moon and drop it! I htink that'll prove... something.
Do it.
Do it.
Pengwuino said:HEY! The ultimate experiment! Bring a cat on the moon and drop it! I htink that'll prove... something.
Do it.
You can do that experiment on earth, you just have to be quick about it, before the cat turns inside-out.lisab said:I bet it would show that cats don't land on their feet, when dropped in no atmosphere.
lisab said:I bet it would show that cats don't land on their feet, when dropped in no atmosphere.
Poor kitty.
Because there's nothing for them to eat, unless the moon was made of cheese in which case there would be mice.jimmysnyder said:why can't they put all the cats on the moon?
You can have one of mine. I got one for proving the moon isn't made of green cheese too, and another for proving it is.mgb_phys said:Where do I collect my Nobel prize?
turbo-1 said:I have information from a credible source that NASA faked Obama's birth certificate. Pass it on.
Pengwuino said:Obama faked the moon landing. Pass it on.
Not so much volcanic, but it has been insulted by monumental collisions that have liquified the core material, causing it to pour out and cool on the surface. This is what the great mares (seas) are made of.jobyts said:[hope I won't spoil the fun, if I ask a serious question in this thread...:)]
How did rock form in the outer surface of moon (with such low gravity)? Does moon have a evidence of volcanic eruption?
You don't need gravity to form rocks. Asteroids have much less gravity than the moon and they are rocks.jobyts said:How did rock form in the outer surface of moon (with such low gravity)?
No, the moon doesn't have a liquid core. Even if it were formed like a planet the small size means that it would have cooled completely (think of surface area to volume).Does moon have a evidence of volcanic eruption?
A billion years ago it had a liquid core but it is cold and dead now. (THough it still gets moon quakes.)mgb_phys said:No, the moon doesn't have a liquid core. Even if it were formed like a planet the small size means that it would have cooled completely (think of surface area to volume).
TheStatutoryApe said:NASA recently found some lost footage from the mission which they are supposed to be releasing soon. Richard C Hoagland has already come out saying that they actually intentionally hid the footage until they had adequate technology to undetectably edit out the parts they don't want us to see. So obviously the picture is fake.
If NASA's technology is due to contact with aliens - they must have been these guysfillindablank said:It isn't fake, they had to edit out the aliens that were there.
DaveC426913 said:
The cameras on the moon shot very low resolution 320lines @ 10 frames/second - this was becuase there wasn't enough bandwidth on the data link to send back regular video (only 500KHz, mono-NTSC needs about 4.5MHz)harrisjr said:And what's up with the new HD footage? this must be upscaled or what, hd wasnt around in the late 1960's :P