Find Acceleration of m_1 & m_2 in Frictionless Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackwing1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Pulleys
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a frictionless pulley system with two masses, m_1 and m_2, and a pulley with a specified moment of inertia and radius. The objective is to determine the acceleration of each mass given their values and the conditions of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between tensions T1 and T2 and their respective effects on the pulley’s rotation. There is exploration of the signs associated with the tensions and how they relate to the direction of torque. Questions arise regarding the definitions of counterclockwise and clockwise tensions and their impact on the equations used.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants clarifying their definitions of tensions and torque directions. There is recognition of inconsistencies in terminology and an effort to align their understanding. No consensus has been reached, but participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of defining forces and torques in the context of the pulley system, which may lead to different interpretations of the equations involved. The discussion reflects a need for clarity in the setup and assumptions made regarding the system.

blackwing1
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pulley has a moment of inertia of 5.0 kg*m^2 and a radius of 0.5m. The cord supporting the masses m_1 and m_2 does not slip, and the axle is frictionless. Find the acceleration of each mass when m_1 = 2.0 kg and m_2 = 5.0 kg.


Homework Equations


F=ma, Fr=I(alpha)


The Attempt at a Solution


My work is attached in the image. The thing that appears or be wrong is that T_2 - T_1 = Ia/r^2, not -Ia/r^2. However, I can't figure out why it shouldn't be negative, as the tangential acceleration for the pulley should be negative, as it is the same as the acceleration downwards, which is negative.
 

Attachments

  • CCF20110731_00000.jpg
    CCF20110731_00000.jpg
    13.5 KB · Views: 696
Physics news on Phys.org
Torque=I*aangular so (T2+(-T1))=I*alinear/r^2

Since It's T2+(-T1), not the other way around, you're taking a tension that goes in the counterclockwise direction and adding a tension that goes in the clockwise direction. When adding these tensions/torques to find the net torque, you have defined the counterclockwise direction as positive. It follows logically that if T2 is larger, you'll get a positive aangular and that the pulley will spin in a counterclockwise direction (The net torque will be in the counterclockwise direction). Otherwise, if T1 is greater, you'll get a negative aangular that will rotate in the clockwise direction. By choosing T2 as the positive tension, you made a counterclockwise rotation positive because T2 acts on the pulley in the counterclockwise direction.

While a counterclockwise aangular may rotation "down" on the left, it rotates "up" on the right, so you can't call it negative or positive based on the linear positive and negative directions. Hope that helps
 
Last edited:
Thanks for answering.
Well, the equation you gave (T1-T2 = Ia/r^2) is the same as the one I got, just multiplied by -1 on both sides (T2-T1 = -Ia/r^2). In your case, you are designating T2 as negative and thus counterclockwise. Shouldn't the acceleration still be negative then?

As for the tensions, shouldn't T2 be the one that's pulling counterclockwise, as it is pulling m2 up, and T1 be clockwise, as it is pulling m1 up?

Thanks.
 
Oh, my bad, I was a little inconsistent with our definitions of T1 and T2. For mine, I mean T1 to be the counterclockwise tension above the mass that is going to fall. In other words, I would have written:

T1-m1g=-m1a, instead of T2-m2g=-m2g

To make our posts consistent, I'll switch T1 with T2 and vice versa, then you can re-read it and hopefully it'll make more sense, sorry!

With the definition changes you are right, T2 pulls counterclockwise and T1 pulls clockwise, if the falling mass and T2 are on the left.
 
No, you were right. Let me rephrase that.

Let m1 be the mass on the left, and m2 the mass on the right. Let T1 be the tension holding up m1 and T2 be the tension holding up m2. So would T1 also be the force that applies the counterclockwise torque, and T2 the clockwise torque?

I always thought that the T2 applied the counterclockwise torque because it is the result of m1g.
 
T1 is on the left, T2 on the right.

T1 applies the counterclockwise torque to the pulley, and T2 applies the clockwise torque to the pulley. You can think of it like this, the rope transmits a particular force (What we call tension) from the mass to the pulley and vice versa. Because of Newton's Third Law, the rope is pulling up on the mass just as much as the mass is pulling down on the rope (The rope is also going down with the mass, so you can't say the mass is pulling down on the rope with force of mg). The rope transmits this tension onto the pulley and pushes the pulley down by this tension, and the pulley pulls up on the rope. In the end, the rope is pushing DOWN on the pulley with the tension. So, T2 is facing downward, and thus applies a clockwise torque.

In other words, you are thinking about the tension only as an "upward" force. Think of it also pushing down on the pulley. Hopefully the diagram with help from wikipedia: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Tension_figure.svg

Just pretend the scaffold is the pulley. You'll notice a downward force/tension "on scaffold by rope". This is the torque.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K