MHB Find Center and Radius of Circle

AI Thread Summary
To find the center and radius of the circle represented by the equation x^2 + y^2 - 10x + 2y + 17 = 0, completing the square is an effective method. The equation can be rearranged into the form (x^2 - 10x + ?) + (y^2 + 2y + ?) = ?. By selecting appropriate values to complete the squares, the center and radius can be easily determined. This approach confirms that the circle's properties can be extracted directly from the transformed equation. Completing the square is a reliable technique for solving such problems.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Determine the center and the radius of circle.

x^2 + y^2 - 10x + 2y + 17 = 0

Can this be done using completing the square?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Determine the center and the radius of circle.

x^2 + y^2 - 10x + 2y + 17 = 0

Can this be done using completing the square?
Yes! Write the equation in the form $(x^2 - 10x +\ ?) + (y^2 + 2y +\ ?) =\ ?$ (choosing the queries so as to complete the squares), and you should be able to read off the answer.
 
Opalg said:
Yes! Write the equation in the form $(x^2 - 10x +\ ?) + (y^2 + 2y +\ ?) =\ ?$ (choosing the queries so as to complete the squares), and you should be able to read off the answer.

I got it.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top