Find Complete Details of Double Slit Experiment Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter RandallB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding detailed documentation of the Double Slit Experiment, specifically regarding parameters like wavelength, slit width, separation, and the resulting interference pattern. Participants express frustration over the lack of comprehensive data in available resources, despite the abundance of general information online. Suggestions include using a laser pointer and specific slit sets from companies like Pasco Scientific for conducting the experiment. Engaging with local university physics departments for access to equipment and guidance is also recommended. Overall, there is a clear need for more accessible, detailed experimental data on this classic physics demonstration.
RandallB
Messages
1,550
Reaction score
0
Anyone know where to find some well documented Double slit experiment results?

Thorough and complete detailed information on all parts:
Wavelength used, width of slits, separation of slits,
Distance from slits to detection screen or film.
Flat screen or detail on a curve in detection screen.
Complete detail on interference pattern produced:
That is Position and size of every pattern produced, i.e. detail of the widening separation between pattern nodes to as far out and as many nodes as possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Google using "double slit". You will get a lot of hits on detailed descriptions.
 
mathman said:
Try Google using "double slit". You will get a lot of hits on detailed descriptions.
Now there is an idea "google" should have though of that!

Sorry for the sarcasm, the point is, out of " about 631,000 " does anyone know of a reference that might actually include complete detail of the whole test and detailed results not just the detail of their descriptions and opinions.
 
sounds like you're trying to get out of doing a lab report. lol.

Regards,

Nenad
 
Nenad said:
sounds like you're trying to get out of doing a lab report. lol.
Regards,
Nenad
Nope never been in a lab good enough for the info I'd like! I’m just amazed at the overwhelming amount of detailed explanation available on sites confirming how bright or informative they are, But with no real background supporting data from actual test layouts and real detailed test results to back it up with.

Be happy to produce my own but I don’t own a lab. Do you know any lab’s (University or other) willing to even talk to an outsider? Midwest would be nice but I’d go anywhere.
 
If you just want to verify the formula for the locations of the interference maxima, n \lambda = 2d \sin \theta, all you need is a laser that produces light of a known wavelength, and some slits of known width and spacing, that can be "covered" by the laser beam. Just let the beam fall on the slits, and let the interference pattern fall on a screen a suitable distance away to allow it to show as a string of spots. Measure the positions of the spots, and the distance from the slits to the screen, and apply a little trigonometry.

A cheap laser pointer will probably work, if you can find out the wavelength. In our undergraduate lab, we use helium-neon lasers, which have a well-known wavelength of 632.8 nm.

Suitable slits are not so easy to find, except from companies like Pasco Scientific that specialize in school and college lab equipment. Pasco's item# OS-9179 is a set of two 2x2-inch slides, one with four single slits of different widths, the other with four pairs of slits with different widths and spacings. The slits are cut in metal film and the widths and spacings are supposed to have a tolerance of 5 microns, which works out to 12.5% for a 0.04mm slit. The set costs $125.

If you want to verify the formula for intensity as a function of angle, basically I = I_0 \cos^2 (something), you'll need a photometer and a fiber-optic probe that you can move through small increments, and a fairly bright laser. With Pasco's stuff, you're looking at least $1000.

If you have a college or university physics department nearby, you might be able to talk one of the professors into showing you the equipment and letting you try it out during a slow period. This would probably be easier at a small school where things are run informally. Or you can find out when they're going to do that experiment in their general physics or intermediate optics course, and sit in on it.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top