Find Corresponding Eigenvectors for Matrices A and B | Quick Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter rock.freak667
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvector
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Messages
6,221
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



The matrix,A,given by
[tex] A = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 7 & -4 & 6\\<br /> 2 & 2 & 2 \\<br /> -3 & 4 & -2 \<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

has eigenvalues 1,2,4 . Find a set of corresponding eigenvectors.

Hence find the eigenvalues of B, where

[tex] B = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 10 & -4 & 6\\<br /> 2 & 5 & 2 \\<br /> -3 & 4 & 1 \<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

and state a corresponding set of eigenvectors.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




Well I easily found the eigenvectors
[itex] \lambda=1[/itex] corresponds to
[tex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> -1\\<br /> 0 \\<br /> 1\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

[itex] \lambda=2[/itex] corresponds to
[tex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> -4\\<br /> 1 \\<br /> 4\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

[itex] \lambda=4[/itex] corresponds to
[tex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> 2\\<br /> 3 \\<br /> 1\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]


Well for the one with B, just solve det(b-[itex]\lambda[/itex]I)=0 to get the e.values... but it says to state a set of e.vectors meaning that I am not supposed to work them out.
The only thing I can really say about A and B is that in B all the elements in the main diagonal are the elements in the main diagonal of A with 3 added to them
 
on Phys.org
In other words, B = A + 3I. Can you find a simple way to get B's eigenvalues and eigenvectors without explicitly working through B? Use the definitions of eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
 
slider142 said:
In other words, B = A + 3I. Can you find a simple way to get B's eigenvalues and eigenvectors without explicitly working through B? Use the definitions of eigenvectors and eigenvalues.

Well I could say that

[itex]Det(B-\lamda I)=0[/itex] and put B=A+3I, then say that I can reduce A to a triangular matrix such that the diagonal elements(Eigenvalues of A)+(3-[itex]\lambda[/itex])=0 and solve from there. And get the e.values to be 7,4,5. But how would the e.vectors be altered?
 
Last edited:
rock.freak667 said:
Well I could say that

[itex]Det(B-\lamda I)=0[/itex] and put B=A+3I, then say that I can reduce A to a triangular matrix such that the diagonal elements(Eigenvalues of A)+(3+[itex]\lambda[/itex])=0 and solve from there. And get the e.values to be 7,4,5. But how would the e.vectors be altered?

The determinant is just a way to extract the eigenvalues mechanically. The original definition should state that L is an eigenvalue of A iff Av = Lv for some vector v (an eigenvector of A), or equivalently, A - LI = 0. Thus, to find eigenvalues L, we are looking for solutions of the equation B - LI = 0, which is equivalent to A + (3 - L)I = 0. We already know the solutions of this equation, specifically we know that L - 3 = L' where L' is an eigenvalue of A. No messing around with matrix forms or determinants necessary. Similarly, you can use the original equation to see how the eigenvectors of A compare to the eigenvectors of B. Can you see the way from here? :)
 
Last edited:
rock.freak667 said:
I got the same answer but it all amounts to the same thing I guess.thanks

But then the e.vectors would be unchanged?

Indeed, you get the equation Av = (L - 3)v, where L is an eigenvalue of B and v is an eigenvector of B, implying that whenever v is an eigenvector for A, it is also an eigenvector for B, albeit with a different eigenvalue.
 
Last edited: