Find derivative of an integral with limits

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of an integral with variable limits, specifically focusing on the function g(x) defined as the sum of two integrals involving a function f(x). Participants are exploring the application of Leibniz's rule for differentiation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Leibniz's rule and the implications of using a dummy variable in the integrand. Questions arise regarding the behavior of the function at the limits of integration, particularly when one limit approaches zero and the potential for undefined behavior in f(x).

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the use of Leibniz's rule and raising concerns about the assumptions underlying the differentiation process. There is an acknowledgment of the need to consider the conditions under which the rule applies, particularly in relation to the behavior of the function at the limits.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function f(x) is not explicitly defined, which raises questions about the validity of certain assumptions, especially when considering limits that could lead to undefined values. There is a mention of hypotheses related to Leibniz's rule and the implications of divergent integrals.

Fire flame
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm in analysis and I'm trying to understand the following.


Homework Statement



g(x) = integral from 0 to x+δ of f(x)dx + integral from x-δ to 0 of f(x)dx

g'(x) = f(x+δ) - f(x -δ)


So how do they get g'(x)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fire flame said:
I'm in analysis and I'm trying to understand the following.


Homework Statement



g(x) = integral from 0 to x+δ of f(x)dx + integral from x-δ to 0 of f(x)dx

g'(x) = f(x+δ) - f(x -δ)


So how do they get g'(x)?

By Leibnitz rule for differentiation of an integral as a function of the upper limit.
By the way, it's better to use a dummy variable in the integrand:$$
\frac d {dx}\int_a^x f(t)\, dt = f(x)$$
 
So I understand why there isn't an f(a) since the derivative of a constant is zero, but like in my problem one of my limits is zero and since the function isn't given it could be anything, even something like f(x) = 1/x which at zero is undefined, but in my problem it just goes away to zero. Why? I hope you understand what I'm trying to say.
 
Fire flame said:
So I understand why there isn't an f(a) since the derivative of a constant is zero, but like in my problem one of my limits is zero and since the function isn't given it could be anything, even something like f(x) = 1/x which at zero is undefined, but in my problem it just goes away to zero. Why? I hope you understand what I'm trying to say.

There are hypotheses on Leibnitz's rule. You can't even talk about, for example, things like$$
F(x) = \int_0^x \frac 1 t\, dt$$because the integral is divergent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K