Find equation of motion of an inclined plane when there's friction

Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
Find equation of motion of a incline plane when there's friction using Lagrangian
Relevant Equations
L=T-V ##\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}})-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}}=0##
1634296468958.png


It's the body. So there's friction on that plane and there's tension also.

$$L=\frac{1}{2}m_1\dot{x}^2+\frac{1}{2}m_2\dot{x}^2-m_2g(l-x)-m_1gx\sin\theta$$
$$f=\mu N=-\mu m_1 g\dot{x}\cos\theta$$
I had found the frictional force's equation from [the class](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UE9kzVcFao).

Using Euler Lagrange :

$$m_1\ddot{x}+m_2\ddot{x}-m_g+m_1g\sin\theta-\mu m_1 g\cos\theta=0$$
After rearranging the equation :

$$\ddot{x}=\frac{m_2+\mu m_1\cos\theta-m_1\sin\theta}{m_1+m_2}g$$

But my book says little bit different thing (only differences in sign) I had tried by taking negative common. Although my answer didn't match. Why?

1634296882446.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a note with the video that there was a sign error in part one which was corrected in part 2. Also note that the problem in this video is similar to but not the same as your problem so you have to be careful.

 
Istiakshovon said:
##\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}})-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}}=0##
Here it looks like you are using the notation ##f## for the Rayleigh dissipation function.

Istiakshovon said:
$$f=\mu N=-\mu m_1 g\dot{x}\cos\theta$$
This is confusing. The first equality seems to be giving the friction force and not the Rayleigh dissipation function. But, the expression on the far right appears to be the dissipation function.

Using the Rayleigh dissipation for dry kinetic friction is awkward due to the fact that the direction of the friction force depends on the direction of motion of ##M_1##. If you take the positive direction for ##x## to be up the incline, then you need to write the force of friction as ##F_f = -\mu N## when ##M_1## is sliding up the slope and as ##F_f = +\mu N## for ##M_1## sliding down the slope.

The Rayleigh dissipation function ##f## is defined such that ##F_f = -\frac {\partial f}{\partial \dot x}##. So, if ##M_1## is sliding up the slope, ##f = +\mu N \dot x##. If ##M_1## is sliding down, then ##f = -\mu N \dot x##. Note that in both cases, ##f## is positive overall (##\dot x## is negative for sliding down the slope). ##f## should always be positive since ##f## represents the magnitude of the rate at which energy is being dissipated.

Your result is good for ##M_1## moving down the slope. The answer given to you is good for ##M_1## sliding up the slope.

If you are dealing with fluid friction of the form ##F_f = -b \dot x## for some positive constant ##b##, then the annoying sign problem does not occur since the sign of ##\dot x## automatically takes care of the direction of the friction force. In this case the dissipation function would be ##f = \frac 1 2 b \dot x^2## and the signs will take care of themselves. Also, now ##f## equals 1/2 the rate at which energy is dissipated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Istiak and bob012345
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top