Find I: Solving Electrical Circuits

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 3K views
cdotter
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/1452/45481808.png

Find I at all branches.

Homework Equations


[itex]\sum I=0[/itex] for a junction.
[itex]\sum V =0[/itex] for a closed loop.


The Attempt at a Solution



I found the solution but I don't understand why they chose certain variables like why the arrows are in a certain direction. From my understanding it's completely arbitrary but when I do it my own way I get a completely different answer.

Could someone tell me if this would give the correct answer?

The arrows and currents [itex]I_1[/itex], [itex]I_2[/itex], and [itex]I_3[/itex] are all drawn in by me.

[itex]I_3[/itex] = [itex]I_1[/itex] + [itex]I_2[/itex] per the junction law. I could then find I for the top inner loop and I for the outer loop, and solve the two simultaneous equations. The other two currents could then be found by back-substitution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi cdotter! :smile:

(btw, two h's in Kirchhoff! :wink:)
cdotter said:
I found the solution but I don't understand why they chose certain variables like why the arrows are in a certain direction. From my understanding it's completely arbitrary but when I do it my own way I get a completely different answer.

you should get the same answer whichever way you do the arrows :confused:

the only difference is that if you put say the I1 arrow the wrong way round, you get a result for I1 multiplied by -1 :smile:

but why are you using round arrows next to the wires? that's really confusing …

put arrows on the wires!

if you're still getting the wrong answer, show us your full calculations, and then we'll see how to help :wink:
 
I don't know, that's just the way my physics professor does it. :confused:

For the top inner loop:

[tex]10V-I_1 \cdot 3 \Omega -((I_1+I_2) \cdot 4 \Omega) + 5V - ((I_1+I_2) \cdot 1 \Omega) - I_1 \cdot 2 \Omega=0[/tex]
[tex]15V-I_1\cdot 10 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 5 \Omega=0[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow I_2=3A-I_1 \cdot 2[/tex]

For the outside loop:

[tex]10V-I_1 \cdot 3 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 10 \Omega - I_1 \cdot 2 \Omega=0[/tex]
[tex]10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 10 \Omega=0[/tex]

Substitute in the top inner loop term:

[tex]10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - (3A-I_1 \cdot 2) \cdot 10 \Omega=0[/tex]
[tex]10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - (30V-I_1 \cdot 20 \Omega)=0[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow I_1= \frac{20V}{15 \Omega} = 1.33 A[/itex]<br /> <br /> According to my textbook, this isn't right. It should be 1.60 A. Where am I going wrong?[/tex]
 
hi cdotter! :smile:
cdotter said:
I don't know, that's just the way my physics professor does it. :confused:

yup, well this is what happens if you don't use straight arrows on every available line…

it's too easy to make a mistake, in this case you haven't noticed that the arrows are going the opposite way at the bottom of the outer loop! :redface:

try again, and in future i suggest you ignore your professor and go for the straight arrows! :rolleyes:

(alternatively, only use the loops with the round arrows on them, in this case the top loop and the bottom loop)
 
[PLAIN]http://img602.imageshack.us/img602/1452/45481808.png

[PLAIN]http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/8694/giflatex.gif

The answer is still wrong. It should be 1.60A. Where am I making a mistake?

edit: My algebra is a bit wrong. It should be 2.7A. Still wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi cdotter! :smile:

your 7ΩI1 should be 10ΩI1 :redface:

(btw, you don't have to do everything in cyclic order …

it's much easier to add the 2Ω to the 3Ω, and the 1Ω to the 4Ω, right at the start, and you're less likely to make a mistake if you do that! :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi cdotter! :smile:

your 7ΩI1 should be 10ΩI1 :redface:

(btw, you don't have to do everything in cyclic order …

it's much easier to add the 2Ω to the 3Ω, and the 1Ω to the 4Ω, right at the start, and you're less likely to make a mistake if you do that! :wink:)

You can do that even though they're on different sides of the voltage source? That would make it much, much easier.
 
I'm finally getting 1.6A! :biggrin: Thank you very much for your help and patience, tiny-tim.