Find I: Solving Electrical Circuits

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving an electrical circuit problem, specifically finding the current (I) at all branches using Kirchhoff's laws. Participants are analyzing the circuit diagram and the relationships between the currents and voltages in the loops.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the choice of variable directions and the implications of these choices on the results. There are attempts to set up equations based on Kirchhoff's laws, with some questioning the correctness of their calculations and the impact of arrow directions on the results.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the importance of consistent arrow direction and have pointed out potential mistakes in calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to solving the circuit, with some participants expressing confusion about their results and seeking clarification.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of differing methods taught by instructors, which may lead to confusion among participants. Some participants are also revisiting their algebraic manipulations to identify errors in their calculations.

cdotter
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/1452/45481808.png

Find I at all branches.

Homework Equations


\sum I=0 for a junction.
\sum V =0 for a closed loop.


The Attempt at a Solution



I found the solution but I don't understand why they chose certain variables like why the arrows are in a certain direction. From my understanding it's completely arbitrary but when I do it my own way I get a completely different answer.

Could someone tell me if this would give the correct answer?

The arrows and currents I_1, I_2, and I_3 are all drawn in by me.

I_3 = I_1 + I_2 per the junction law. I could then find I for the top inner loop and I for the outer loop, and solve the two simultaneous equations. The other two currents could then be found by back-substitution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi cdotter! :smile:

(btw, two h's in Kirchhoff! :wink:)
cdotter said:
I found the solution but I don't understand why they chose certain variables like why the arrows are in a certain direction. From my understanding it's completely arbitrary but when I do it my own way I get a completely different answer.

you should get the same answer whichever way you do the arrows :confused:

the only difference is that if you put say the I1 arrow the wrong way round, you get a result for I1 multiplied by -1 :smile:

but why are you using round arrows next to the wires? that's really confusing …

put arrows on the wires!

if you're still getting the wrong answer, show us your full calculations, and then we'll see how to help :wink:
 
I don't know, that's just the way my physics professor does it. :confused:

For the top inner loop:

10V-I_1 \cdot 3 \Omega -((I_1+I_2) \cdot 4 \Omega) + 5V - ((I_1+I_2) \cdot 1 \Omega) - I_1 \cdot 2 \Omega=0
15V-I_1\cdot 10 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 5 \Omega=0
\Rightarrow I_2=3A-I_1 \cdot 2

For the outside loop:

10V-I_1 \cdot 3 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 10 \Omega - I_1 \cdot 2 \Omega=0
10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 10 \Omega=0

Substitute in the top inner loop term:

10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - (3A-I_1 \cdot 2) \cdot 10 \Omega=0
10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - (30V-I_1 \cdot 20 \Omega)=0
\Rightarrow I_1= \frac{20V}{15 \Omega} = 1.33 A[/itex]<br /> <br /> According to my textbook, this isn&#039;t right. It should be 1.60 A. Where am I going wrong?
 
hi cdotter! :smile:
cdotter said:
I don't know, that's just the way my physics professor does it. :confused:

yup, well this is what happens if you don't use straight arrows on every available line…

it's too easy to make a mistake, in this case you haven't noticed that the arrows are going the opposite way at the bottom of the outer loop! :redface:

try again, and in future i suggest you ignore your professor and go for the straight arrows! :rolleyes:

(alternatively, only use the loops with the round arrows on them, in this case the top loop and the bottom loop)
 
[PLAIN]http://img602.imageshack.us/img602/1452/45481808.png

[PLAIN]http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/8694/giflatex.gif

The answer is still wrong. It should be 1.60A. Where am I making a mistake?

edit: My algebra is a bit wrong. It should be 2.7A. Still wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi cdotter! :smile:

your 7ΩI1 should be 10ΩI1 :redface:

(btw, you don't have to do everything in cyclic order …

it's much easier to add the 2Ω to the 3Ω, and the 1Ω to the 4Ω, right at the start, and you're less likely to make a mistake if you do that! :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi cdotter! :smile:

your 7ΩI1 should be 10ΩI1 :redface:

(btw, you don't have to do everything in cyclic order …

it's much easier to add the 2Ω to the 3Ω, and the 1Ω to the 4Ω, right at the start, and you're less likely to make a mistake if you do that! :wink:)

You can do that even though they're on different sides of the voltage source? That would make it much, much easier.
 
Yup, so long as they have the same current through them! :biggrin:
 
I'm finally getting 1.6A! :biggrin: Thank you very much for your help and patience, tiny-tim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K