Find Invariant Lines for Matrix Transformations | y=mx Form | Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariant Lines
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding invariant lines of the form y=mx for two given matrix transformations. The matrices under consideration are a 2x2 matrix with elements {{5, 15}, {-2, 8}} and another with elements {{3, -5}, {-4, 2}}. Participants explore the conditions under which a line remains invariant under these transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of determining invariant lines by examining how points on the line transform under the matrix. There is an exploration of the relationship between the input vector and the output vector, questioning the assumptions made about the invariance of points versus lines. Some participants express confusion about the definitions and implications of invariant lines and eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, with some participants providing insights into the nature of invariant lines and eigenvectors. A few participants have offered alternative perspectives on the requirements for a line to be considered invariant, suggesting that the mapping does not need to preserve individual points but rather the form of the line itself. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered, and some productive guidance has been shared.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in the matrix definitions and express uncertainty regarding the conditions for invariance. There is also mention of the relevance of eigenvectors in understanding the problem, indicating a connection to broader concepts in linear algebra.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find all invariant lines, of the form y=mx for the matrix transformation.

a) [itex]\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 5 & 15 \\<br /> -2 & 8<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]

b) [itex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 3 & -5 \\<br /> -4 & 2<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 5 & 15 \\<br /> -2 & 8<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x \\<br /> \text{mx}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> 5x+15\text{mx} \\<br /> -2x-8\text{mx}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]

And for it to map onto the line, this is probably the wrong bit.

[itex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> 5x+15\text{mx} \\<br /> -2x-8\text{mx}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x \\<br /> \text{mx}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]


[itex]x=5x+15mx \Rightarrow 4=15m \Rightarrow m=\frac{4}{15}[/itex]

I'll stop there because I know it's wrong. So what am I doing wrong, and what false assumptions have been made?

I think if I put y=m(5x+15mx) i'll get the answer but I don't see the logic behind that at all even though it's been explained to be, in my head you could be going y=m(m(m(m(m(m(m(m... forever if you did that.

Edit: Nope didn't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that what you are asked to do here is to find all vectors (x, y) for which multiplying on the left by your matrix produces a new vector (kx, ky) that is a multiple of the input vector.

I don't believe that there are any for your first matrix, but I believe there are two for your second matrix.

If my understanding of this problem is correct, it is setting you up for a discussion of eigenvectors. An eigenvector is a nonzero vector x such that Ax = kx. IOW, multiplication of x by the matrix A produces a vector that is a scalar multiple of the input vector; i.e., a vector that has the same direction (possibly pointing the other direction) and therefore, has the same slope.
 
Mark44 said:
I think that what you are asked to do here is to find all vectors (x, y) for which multiplying on the left by your matrix produces a new vector (kx, ky) that is a multiple of the input vector.

I don't believe that there are any for your first matrix, but I believe there are two for your second matrix.

If my understanding of this problem is correct, it is setting you up for a discussion of eigenvectors. An eigenvector is a nonzero vector x such that Ax = kx. IOW, multiplication of x by the matrix A produces a vector that is a scalar multiple of the input vector; i.e., a vector that has the same direction (possibly pointing the other direction) and therefore, has the same slope.

error in the question, It supposed to be {{5,15},{-2,-8}} not +8!

edit: yes you're right it's the preamble to the chapter on eigenvectors and eigenvalues, diagonalisation etc. It is still troubling me though, how I can find lines that map to themselves (invariant lines) such as y=mx or y=mx+c, but eigenvectors are fine. It's just this that's confusing me. An example would be good. Or the solution to these?
 
Saying a line is invariant does NOT mean that points are invariant. The line y= mx is invariant as long as a point, (x, mx) is mapped into something of the form (a, ma), not necessarily with a= x.
You do not need
[itex]\left(\begin{array}{c} 5x+15\text{mx} \\ -2x-8\text{mx}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} x \\ \text{mx}\end{array}\right)[/itex]
rather you need
[itex]\left(\begin{array}{c} 5x+15\text{mx} \\ -2x-8\text{mx}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} a \\ \text{ma}\end{array}\right)[/itex]
for some number a. More specifically, you need to look at
[tex]\frac{-2x-8mx}{5x+ 15mx}= \frac{-2-8m}{5+ 15m}= \frac{ma}{a}= m[/tex]
Solve that for m.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Saying a line is invariant does NOT mean that points are invariant. The line y= mx is invariant as long as a point, (x, mx) is mapped into something of the form (a, ma), not necessarily with a= x.
You do not need
[itex]\left(\begin{array}{c} 5x+15\text{mx} \\ -2x-8\text{mx}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} x \\ \text{mx}\end{array}\right)[/itex]
rather you need
[itex]\left(\begin{array}{c} 5x+15\text{mx} \\ -2x-8\text{mx}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} a \\ \text{ma}\end{array}\right)[/itex]
for some number a. More specifically, you need to look at
[tex]\frac{-2x-8mx}{5x+ 15mx}= \frac{-2-8m}{5+ 15m}= \frac{ma}{a}= m[/tex]
Solve that for m.


Ok so,

[itex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 5 & 15 \\<br /> -2 & -8<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x \\<br /> \text{mx}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> 5x+15\text{mx} \\<br /> -2x-8\text{mx}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x' \\<br /> \text{mx}'<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]

[itex]mx'=m(5x+15mx)[/itex]

[itex]-2x-8mx=m(5x+15mx)[/itex]

[itex]\Rightarrow 15m^2+13m+2=0[/itex]

[itex]m=-\frac{1}{5},-\frac{2}{3}[/itex]
 
Gregg said:
error in the question, It supposed to be {{5,15},{-2,-8}} not +8!

edit: yes you're right it's the preamble to the chapter on eigenvectors and eigenvalues, diagonalisation etc. It is still troubling me though, how I can find lines that map to themselves (invariant lines) such as y=mx or y=mx+c, but eigenvectors are fine. It's just this that's confusing me. An example would be good. Or the solution to these?

For your 2nd problem, calculate Ax, with x = (-5/4, 1)T. You should get a vector that is a constant multiple of x. In fact, when you multiply Ay, where y is any multiple of the vector I showed for x, you'll get another vector that is the same constant multiple of y. This shows that for this matrix A, the vector (-5/4, 1) is special in the sense that the product of A and this vector is another vector whose only difference is that it is longer than (-5/4, 1). For this matrix, there is another vector that behaves the same way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K