Efficient Logarithmic Calculations for 0.3048 without a Calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter RChristenk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the logarithm of 0.3048 without a calculator, specifically using the equation log(0.3048) = 3log(2) + log(3) + log(127) - 4log(10). Participants explore approximations for log(127), suggesting values such as 126 and 128, and discuss the feasibility of using 2^8 = 128 for simplification. The conversation emphasizes the importance of interpolation between approximations to achieve a more accurate result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic properties and base 10 logarithms
  • Familiarity with exponentiation, specifically powers of 2
  • Basic knowledge of approximation techniques in mathematics
  • Ability to perform factorization of numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research logarithmic identities and their applications in calculations
  • Learn about interpolation methods for estimating logarithmic values
  • Explore advanced approximation techniques for logarithmic calculations
  • Study the properties of logarithms in different bases, including base 10 and natural logarithms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying logarithmic functions, and anyone interested in manual calculation techniques for logarithms.

RChristenk
Messages
73
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Given ##\log2=0.3010300##, ##\log3=0.4771213##, ##\log7=0.8450980##, find ##\log0.3048##
Relevant Equations
Logarithm rules
##0.3048=\dfrac{3048}{10000}=\dfrac{2^3\cdot3\cdot127}{10^4}##

##\log0.3048=\log(\dfrac{2^3\cdot3\cdot127}{10^4})##

##\Rightarrow 3\log2+\log3+\log127-4\log10##

I don't have the value for ##\log127##, and this problem is to be solved without a calculator. All the logarithms are base ##10##. I'm not sure how else to factorize ##0.3048##. Is there another way entirely or some artificial artifice I can use here? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I'd worry about this problem. I can't see a solution.
 
As an approximation, can you use ##2^8 = 128##? CORRECTION: ##2^7=128##
##2^3*3*128 = 3072##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
FactChecker said:
As an approximation, can you use ##2^8 = 128##?
##2^3*3*128 = 3072##.
But then, what's ##\log 7## for?

##126##?

Both?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
Hill said:
But then, what's ##\log 7## for?

##126##?

Both?
Good point! So both approximations are doable with the information given. I don't know which one was expected or better. It seems like 126 was expected.
 
FactChecker said:
Good point! So both approximations are doable with the information given. I don't know which one was expected or better. It seems like 126 was expected.
Or you could do both approximations and interpolate.
 
FactChecker said:
Good point! So both approximations are doable with the information given. I don't know which one was expected or better. It seems like 126 was expected.
Maybe, the midpoint between ##\log 126## and ##\log 128##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
FactChecker said:
As an approximation, can you use ##2^8 = 128##?
##2^3*3*128 = 3072##.
##2^8=256.## It's ##\log 127 \approx 7\log 2.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
fresh_42 said:
##2^8=256.## It's ##\log 127 \approx 7\log 2.##
Thanks! I stand corrected and will note that in the post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K